Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice...

Electronic data

  • Jackson_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters

    Rights statement: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Final published version, 5.26 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. / Jackson, L. S.; Crook, J. A.; Jarvis, Andrew James et al.
In: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, No. 4, 28.02.2015, p. 1223-1231.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jackson, LS, Crook, JA, Jarvis, AJ, Leedal, DT, Ridgwell, A, Vaughan, N & Forster, PM 2015, 'Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering', Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240

APA

Jackson, L. S., Crook, J. A., Jarvis, A. J., Leedal, D. T., Ridgwell, A., Vaughan, N., & Forster, P. M. (2015). Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(4), 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240

Vancouver

Jackson LS, Crook JA, Jarvis AJ, Leedal DT, Ridgwell A, Vaughan N et al. Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters. 2015 Feb 28;42(4):1223-1231. Epub 2015 Feb 25. doi: 10.1002/2014GL062240

Author

Jackson, L. S. ; Crook, J. A. ; Jarvis, Andrew James et al. / Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. In: Geophysical Research Letters. 2015 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 1223-1231.

Bibtex

@article{96839d0de9e2465fba97f7abb5cdfa6e,
title = "Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering",
abstract = "In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no rerunning or reference to control simulations. SO2 injection rates were proposed using a novel model predictive control regime which incorporated a second simpler climate model to forecast “optimal” decision pathways. Commencing the simulation in 2018, Arctic sea ice cover was remediated by 2043 and maintained until solar geoengineering was terminated. We found quantifying climate side effects problematic because internal climate variability hampered detection of regional climate changes beyond the Arctic. Nevertheless, through decision maker learning and the accumulation of at least 10 years time series data exploited through an annual review cycle, uncertainties in observations and forcings were successfully managed.",
author = "Jackson, {L. S.} and Crook, {J. A.} and Jarvis, {Andrew James} and Leedal, {David Thomas} and A. Ridgwell and Naomi Vaughan and Forster, {P. M.}",
note = "This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1002/2014GL062240",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1223--1231",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",
issn = "0094-8276",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering

AU - Jackson, L. S.

AU - Crook, J. A.

AU - Jarvis, Andrew James

AU - Leedal, David Thomas

AU - Ridgwell, A.

AU - Vaughan, Naomi

AU - Forster, P. M.

N1 - This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PY - 2015/2/28

Y1 - 2015/2/28

N2 - In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no rerunning or reference to control simulations. SO2 injection rates were proposed using a novel model predictive control regime which incorporated a second simpler climate model to forecast “optimal” decision pathways. Commencing the simulation in 2018, Arctic sea ice cover was remediated by 2043 and maintained until solar geoengineering was terminated. We found quantifying climate side effects problematic because internal climate variability hampered detection of regional climate changes beyond the Arctic. Nevertheless, through decision maker learning and the accumulation of at least 10 years time series data exploited through an annual review cycle, uncertainties in observations and forcings were successfully managed.

AB - In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no rerunning or reference to control simulations. SO2 injection rates were proposed using a novel model predictive control regime which incorporated a second simpler climate model to forecast “optimal” decision pathways. Commencing the simulation in 2018, Arctic sea ice cover was remediated by 2043 and maintained until solar geoengineering was terminated. We found quantifying climate side effects problematic because internal climate variability hampered detection of regional climate changes beyond the Arctic. Nevertheless, through decision maker learning and the accumulation of at least 10 years time series data exploited through an annual review cycle, uncertainties in observations and forcings were successfully managed.

U2 - 10.1002/2014GL062240

DO - 10.1002/2014GL062240

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 1223

EP - 1231

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 4

ER -