Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Automated threshold selection and associated in...

Electronic data

  • Threshold_Selection_paper

    Accepted author manuscript, 317 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Automated threshold selection and associated inference uncertainty for univariate extremes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Automated threshold selection and associated inference uncertainty for univariate extremes. / Murphy, Conor; Tawn, Jonathan; Varty, Zak.
In: Technometrics, 10.10.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{ca84a49ddf8d48429a3c14f8054e6ee9,
title = "Automated threshold selection and associated inference uncertainty for univariate extremes",
abstract = "Threshold selection is a fundamental problem in any threshold-based extreme value analysis. While models are asymptotically motivated, selecting an appropriate threshold for finite samples is difficult and highly subjective through standard methods. Inference for high quantiles can also be highly sensitive to the choice of threshold. Too low a threshold choice leads to bias in the fit of the extreme value model, while too high a choice leads to unnecessary additional uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters. We develop a novel methodology for automated threshold selection that directly tackles this bias-variance trade-off. We also develop a method to account for the uncertainty in the threshold estimation and propagate this uncertainty through to high quantile inference. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for threshold selection and subsequent extreme quantile estimation, relative to the leading existing methods, and show how the method's effectiveness is not sensitive to the tuning parameters. We apply our method to the well-known, troublesome example of the River Nidd dataset.",
author = "Conor Murphy and Jonathan Tawn and Zak Varty",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "10",
language = "English",
journal = "Technometrics",
issn = "0040-1706",
publisher = "American Statistical Association",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated threshold selection and associated inference uncertainty for univariate extremes

AU - Murphy, Conor

AU - Tawn, Jonathan

AU - Varty, Zak

PY - 2024/10/10

Y1 - 2024/10/10

N2 - Threshold selection is a fundamental problem in any threshold-based extreme value analysis. While models are asymptotically motivated, selecting an appropriate threshold for finite samples is difficult and highly subjective through standard methods. Inference for high quantiles can also be highly sensitive to the choice of threshold. Too low a threshold choice leads to bias in the fit of the extreme value model, while too high a choice leads to unnecessary additional uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters. We develop a novel methodology for automated threshold selection that directly tackles this bias-variance trade-off. We also develop a method to account for the uncertainty in the threshold estimation and propagate this uncertainty through to high quantile inference. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for threshold selection and subsequent extreme quantile estimation, relative to the leading existing methods, and show how the method's effectiveness is not sensitive to the tuning parameters. We apply our method to the well-known, troublesome example of the River Nidd dataset.

AB - Threshold selection is a fundamental problem in any threshold-based extreme value analysis. While models are asymptotically motivated, selecting an appropriate threshold for finite samples is difficult and highly subjective through standard methods. Inference for high quantiles can also be highly sensitive to the choice of threshold. Too low a threshold choice leads to bias in the fit of the extreme value model, while too high a choice leads to unnecessary additional uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters. We develop a novel methodology for automated threshold selection that directly tackles this bias-variance trade-off. We also develop a method to account for the uncertainty in the threshold estimation and propagate this uncertainty through to high quantile inference. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for threshold selection and subsequent extreme quantile estimation, relative to the leading existing methods, and show how the method's effectiveness is not sensitive to the tuning parameters. We apply our method to the well-known, troublesome example of the River Nidd dataset.

M3 - Journal article

JO - Technometrics

JF - Technometrics

SN - 0040-1706

ER -