Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Building a multimodel flood prediction system w...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive. / Zsótér, Ervin; Pappenberger, Florian; Smith, Paul et al.
In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 17, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 2923-2940.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Zsótér, E, Pappenberger, F, Smith, P, Emerton, RE, Dutra, E, Wetterhall, F, Richardson, D, Bogner, K & Balsamo, G 2016, 'Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive', Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2923-2940. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1

APA

Zsótér, E., Pappenberger, F., Smith, P., Emerton, R. E., Dutra, E., Wetterhall, F., Richardson, D., Bogner, K., & Balsamo, G. (2016). Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17(11), 2923-2940. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1

Vancouver

Zsótér E, Pappenberger F, Smith P, Emerton RE, Dutra E, Wetterhall F et al. Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):2923-2940. doi: 10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1

Author

Zsótér, Ervin ; Pappenberger, Florian ; Smith, Paul et al. / Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive. In: Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 11. pp. 2923-2940.

Bibtex

@article{13556efaf88e46feb14575e37e14a8d2,
title = "Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive",
abstract = "In the last decade operational probabilistic ensemble flood forecasts have become common in supporting decision-making processes leading to risk reduction. Ensemble forecasts can assess uncertainty, but they are limited to the uncertainty in a specific modeling system. Many of the current operational flood prediction systems use a multimodel approach to better represent the uncertainty arising from insufficient model structure. This study presents a multimodel approach to building a global flood prediction system using multiple atmospheric reanalysis datasets for river initial conditions and multiple TIGGE forcing inputs to the ECMWF land surface model. A sensitivity study is carried out to clarify the effect of using archive ensemble meteorological predictions and uncoupled land surface models. The probabilistic discharge forecasts derived from the different atmospheric models are compared with those from the multimodel combination. The potential for further improving forecast skill by bias correction and Bayesian model averaging is examined. The results show that the impact of the different TIGGE input variables in the HTESSEL/Catchment-Based Macroscale Floodplain model (CaMa-Flood) setup is rather limited other than for precipitation. This provides a sufficient basis for evaluation of the multimodel discharge predictions. The results also highlight that the three applied reanalysis datasets have different error characteristics that allow for large potential gains with a multimodel combination. It is shown that large improvements to the forecast performance for all models can be achieved through appropriate statistical postprocessing (bias and spread correction). A simple multimodel combination generally improves the forecasts, while a more advanced combination using Bayesian model averaging provides further benefits.",
keywords = "Flood events, Hydrology, Model evaluation/performance, Rivers, Runoff, Statistical techniques",
author = "Ervin Zs{\'o}t{\'e}r and Florian Pappenberger and Paul Smith and Emerton, {Rebecca Elizabeth} and Emanuel Dutra and Fredrik Wetterhall and David Richardson and Konrad Bogner and Gianpaolo Balsamo",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "2923--2940",
journal = "Journal of Hydrometeorology",
issn = "1525-755X",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building a multimodel flood prediction system with the TIGGE archive

AU - Zsótér, Ervin

AU - Pappenberger, Florian

AU - Smith, Paul

AU - Emerton, Rebecca Elizabeth

AU - Dutra, Emanuel

AU - Wetterhall, Fredrik

AU - Richardson, David

AU - Bogner, Konrad

AU - Balsamo, Gianpaolo

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - In the last decade operational probabilistic ensemble flood forecasts have become common in supporting decision-making processes leading to risk reduction. Ensemble forecasts can assess uncertainty, but they are limited to the uncertainty in a specific modeling system. Many of the current operational flood prediction systems use a multimodel approach to better represent the uncertainty arising from insufficient model structure. This study presents a multimodel approach to building a global flood prediction system using multiple atmospheric reanalysis datasets for river initial conditions and multiple TIGGE forcing inputs to the ECMWF land surface model. A sensitivity study is carried out to clarify the effect of using archive ensemble meteorological predictions and uncoupled land surface models. The probabilistic discharge forecasts derived from the different atmospheric models are compared with those from the multimodel combination. The potential for further improving forecast skill by bias correction and Bayesian model averaging is examined. The results show that the impact of the different TIGGE input variables in the HTESSEL/Catchment-Based Macroscale Floodplain model (CaMa-Flood) setup is rather limited other than for precipitation. This provides a sufficient basis for evaluation of the multimodel discharge predictions. The results also highlight that the three applied reanalysis datasets have different error characteristics that allow for large potential gains with a multimodel combination. It is shown that large improvements to the forecast performance for all models can be achieved through appropriate statistical postprocessing (bias and spread correction). A simple multimodel combination generally improves the forecasts, while a more advanced combination using Bayesian model averaging provides further benefits.

AB - In the last decade operational probabilistic ensemble flood forecasts have become common in supporting decision-making processes leading to risk reduction. Ensemble forecasts can assess uncertainty, but they are limited to the uncertainty in a specific modeling system. Many of the current operational flood prediction systems use a multimodel approach to better represent the uncertainty arising from insufficient model structure. This study presents a multimodel approach to building a global flood prediction system using multiple atmospheric reanalysis datasets for river initial conditions and multiple TIGGE forcing inputs to the ECMWF land surface model. A sensitivity study is carried out to clarify the effect of using archive ensemble meteorological predictions and uncoupled land surface models. The probabilistic discharge forecasts derived from the different atmospheric models are compared with those from the multimodel combination. The potential for further improving forecast skill by bias correction and Bayesian model averaging is examined. The results show that the impact of the different TIGGE input variables in the HTESSEL/Catchment-Based Macroscale Floodplain model (CaMa-Flood) setup is rather limited other than for precipitation. This provides a sufficient basis for evaluation of the multimodel discharge predictions. The results also highlight that the three applied reanalysis datasets have different error characteristics that allow for large potential gains with a multimodel combination. It is shown that large improvements to the forecast performance for all models can be achieved through appropriate statistical postprocessing (bias and spread correction). A simple multimodel combination generally improves the forecasts, while a more advanced combination using Bayesian model averaging provides further benefits.

KW - Flood events

KW - Hydrology

KW - Model evaluation/performance

KW - Rivers

KW - Runoff

KW - Statistical techniques

U2 - 10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1

DO - 10.1175/jhm-d-15-0130.1

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85013807108

VL - 17

SP - 2923

EP - 2940

JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology

JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology

SN - 1525-755X

IS - 11

ER -