Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review
<mark>Journal publication date</mark> | 30/04/2006 |
---|---|
<mark>Journal</mark> | Sociology |
Issue number | 2 |
Volume | 40 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Pages (from-to) | 277-295 |
Publication Status | Published |
<mark>Original language</mark> | English |
In recent decades neo-liberal reform has significantly impacted on public sector professionals. Sociological interest in such impact has tended to focus on professionals as subjects of such reform: as either de-professionalized 'victims' who feel oppressed by the structures of control or strategic operators seeking to contest the spaces and contradictions of market, managerial and audit cultures. Such a dualism is reflective of wider separations of agency and structure that have plagued sociology down the years. Our approach challenges modernizing agendas which seek to re-professionalize or empower professionals without examining the changing conditions of their work or the neo-liberal conditions which frame their practice. It also questions the policy outcomes of reconciling the dualism between agency and structure through a 'third way' politics that purports to remove the tensions and conflicts between professions and various stakeholders, the private and the public, and markets and civic society.