Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Challenging dualism

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in 'troubled'times

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in 'troubled'times. / Gleeson, Denis; Knights, David.
In: Sociology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 30.04.2006, p. 277-295.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gleeson D, Knights D. Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in 'troubled'times. Sociology. 2006 Apr 30;40(2):277-295. doi: 10.1177/0038038506062033

Author

Gleeson, Denis ; Knights, David. / Challenging dualism : Public professionalism in 'troubled'times. In: Sociology. 2006 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 277-295.

Bibtex

@article{be136915a3e94d1889b96001af81ec2d,
title = "Challenging dualism: Public professionalism in 'troubled'times",
abstract = "In recent decades neo-liberal reform has significantly impacted on public sector professionals. Sociological interest in such impact has tended to focus on professionals as subjects of such reform: as either de-professionalized 'victims' who feel oppressed by the structures of control or strategic operators seeking to contest the spaces and contradictions of market, managerial and audit cultures. Such a dualism is reflective of wider separations of agency and structure that have plagued sociology down the years. Our approach challenges modernizing agendas which seek to re-professionalize or empower professionals without examining the changing conditions of their work or the neo-liberal conditions which frame their practice. It also questions the policy outcomes of reconciling the dualism between agency and structure through a 'third way' politics that purports to remove the tensions and conflicts between professions and various stakeholders, the private and the public, and markets and civic society.",
keywords = "Dualism, Professionalism, Public",
author = "Denis Gleeson and David Knights",
year = "2006",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/0038038506062033",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "277--295",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging dualism

T2 - Public professionalism in 'troubled'times

AU - Gleeson, Denis

AU - Knights, David

PY - 2006/4/30

Y1 - 2006/4/30

N2 - In recent decades neo-liberal reform has significantly impacted on public sector professionals. Sociological interest in such impact has tended to focus on professionals as subjects of such reform: as either de-professionalized 'victims' who feel oppressed by the structures of control or strategic operators seeking to contest the spaces and contradictions of market, managerial and audit cultures. Such a dualism is reflective of wider separations of agency and structure that have plagued sociology down the years. Our approach challenges modernizing agendas which seek to re-professionalize or empower professionals without examining the changing conditions of their work or the neo-liberal conditions which frame their practice. It also questions the policy outcomes of reconciling the dualism between agency and structure through a 'third way' politics that purports to remove the tensions and conflicts between professions and various stakeholders, the private and the public, and markets and civic society.

AB - In recent decades neo-liberal reform has significantly impacted on public sector professionals. Sociological interest in such impact has tended to focus on professionals as subjects of such reform: as either de-professionalized 'victims' who feel oppressed by the structures of control or strategic operators seeking to contest the spaces and contradictions of market, managerial and audit cultures. Such a dualism is reflective of wider separations of agency and structure that have plagued sociology down the years. Our approach challenges modernizing agendas which seek to re-professionalize or empower professionals without examining the changing conditions of their work or the neo-liberal conditions which frame their practice. It also questions the policy outcomes of reconciling the dualism between agency and structure through a 'third way' politics that purports to remove the tensions and conflicts between professions and various stakeholders, the private and the public, and markets and civic society.

KW - Dualism

KW - Professionalism

KW - Public

U2 - 10.1177/0038038506062033

DO - 10.1177/0038038506062033

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33645380773

VL - 40

SP - 277

EP - 295

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 2

ER -