Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.

Lancaster Medical School

Text available via DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2
Final published version
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function. / Jarvis, HL; Nester, CJ; Bowden, PD et al.
In: Journal of foot and ankle research, No. 10, 7, 03.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{6d128e691b0041d6b27fd04f082f8be9,

title = "Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.",

author = "HL Jarvis and CJ Nester and PD Bowden and RK Jones",

year = "2017",

month = feb,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of foot and ankle research",

number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function.

AU - Jarvis, HL

AU - Nester, CJ

AU - Bowden, PD

AU - Jones, RK

PY - 2017/2/3

Y1 - 2017/2/3

U2 - 10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2

DO - 10.1186/s13047-017-0189-2

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28174604

JO - Journal of foot and ankle research

JF - Journal of foot and ankle research

IS - 10

M1 - 7

ER -

Research

Links

Text available via DOI: