Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Chasing our tails : psychological, institutiona...
View graph of relations

Chasing our tails : psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Chasing our tails : psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia. / Browne, A. L.; Bishop, B. J.
In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 354-361.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Browne AL, Bishop BJ. Chasing our tails : psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2011 Jun;47(3):354-361. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9390-1

Author

Bibtex

@article{8d21e02649d54a3c9b1b99c0bc33f663,
title = "Chasing our tails : psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia.",
abstract = "Natural Resource Management (NRM) and Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) have been guiding frameworks in Australia for a number of decades. Recently, NRM and ESD have become central to climate change mitigation. In this paper, we explore the psychological paradoxes that function within climate change settings, with particular attention devoted to the way that research and development reinforces these paradoxes by advocating for participatory forms of inquiry. Paradox emerges in NRM at psychological, institutional, and organisational levels. Paradoxes are also features of different forms of democracy such as neoliberal and participatory democracy. Although NRM, ESD and climate change are often conceptualised as distinct issue domains, these policy areas are fundamentally interconnected in both theory and in practice. This interconnection between these policy and research settings, reflections on paradox, and the experience of incorporating community psychology into the paradoxical settings of NRM and climate change are captured in this paper.",
author = "Browne, {A. L.} and Bishop, {B. J.}",
note = "The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s10464-010-9390-1",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "354--361",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chasing our tails : psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia.

AU - Browne, A. L.

AU - Bishop, B. J.

N1 - The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Natural Resource Management (NRM) and Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) have been guiding frameworks in Australia for a number of decades. Recently, NRM and ESD have become central to climate change mitigation. In this paper, we explore the psychological paradoxes that function within climate change settings, with particular attention devoted to the way that research and development reinforces these paradoxes by advocating for participatory forms of inquiry. Paradox emerges in NRM at psychological, institutional, and organisational levels. Paradoxes are also features of different forms of democracy such as neoliberal and participatory democracy. Although NRM, ESD and climate change are often conceptualised as distinct issue domains, these policy areas are fundamentally interconnected in both theory and in practice. This interconnection between these policy and research settings, reflections on paradox, and the experience of incorporating community psychology into the paradoxical settings of NRM and climate change are captured in this paper.

AB - Natural Resource Management (NRM) and Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) have been guiding frameworks in Australia for a number of decades. Recently, NRM and ESD have become central to climate change mitigation. In this paper, we explore the psychological paradoxes that function within climate change settings, with particular attention devoted to the way that research and development reinforces these paradoxes by advocating for participatory forms of inquiry. Paradox emerges in NRM at psychological, institutional, and organisational levels. Paradoxes are also features of different forms of democracy such as neoliberal and participatory democracy. Although NRM, ESD and climate change are often conceptualised as distinct issue domains, these policy areas are fundamentally interconnected in both theory and in practice. This interconnection between these policy and research settings, reflections on paradox, and the experience of incorporating community psychology into the paradoxical settings of NRM and climate change are captured in this paper.

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-010-9390-1

DO - 10.1007/s10464-010-9390-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 354

EP - 361

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 3

ER -