Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using...
View graph of relations

Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights. / Kolassa, Stephan.
In: International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 238-251.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kolassa S. Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights. International Journal of Forecasting. 2011 Apr 1;27(2):238-251. Epub 2010 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.006

Author

Kolassa, Stephan. / Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights. In: International Journal of Forecasting. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 238-251.

Bibtex

@article{e677b12fb1514b7796f0e917ecf03d9d,
title = "Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights",
abstract = "Simple forecast combinations such as medians and trimmed or winsorized means are known to improve the accuracy of point forecasts, and Akaike{\textquoteright}s Information Criterion (AIC) has given rise to so-called Akaike weights, which have been used successfully to combine statistical models for inference and prediction in specialist fields, e.g., ecology and medicine. We examine combining exponential smoothing point and interval forecasts using weights derived from AIC, small-sample-corrected AIC and BIC on the M1 and M3 Competition datasets. Weighted forecast combinations perform better than forecasts selected using information criteria, in terms of both point forecast accuracy and prediction interval coverage. Simple combinations and weighted combinations do not consistently outperform one another, while simple combinations sometimes perform worse than single forecasts selected by information criteria. We find a tendency for a longer history to be associated with a better prediction interval coverage.",
keywords = "AIC, BIC, Combining forecasts, Information criteria, Model selection",
author = "Stephan Kolassa",
year = "2011",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.006",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "238--251",
journal = "International Journal of Forecasting",
issn = "0169-2070",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining exponential smoothing forecasts using Akaike weights

AU - Kolassa, Stephan

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Simple forecast combinations such as medians and trimmed or winsorized means are known to improve the accuracy of point forecasts, and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) has given rise to so-called Akaike weights, which have been used successfully to combine statistical models for inference and prediction in specialist fields, e.g., ecology and medicine. We examine combining exponential smoothing point and interval forecasts using weights derived from AIC, small-sample-corrected AIC and BIC on the M1 and M3 Competition datasets. Weighted forecast combinations perform better than forecasts selected using information criteria, in terms of both point forecast accuracy and prediction interval coverage. Simple combinations and weighted combinations do not consistently outperform one another, while simple combinations sometimes perform worse than single forecasts selected by information criteria. We find a tendency for a longer history to be associated with a better prediction interval coverage.

AB - Simple forecast combinations such as medians and trimmed or winsorized means are known to improve the accuracy of point forecasts, and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) has given rise to so-called Akaike weights, which have been used successfully to combine statistical models for inference and prediction in specialist fields, e.g., ecology and medicine. We examine combining exponential smoothing point and interval forecasts using weights derived from AIC, small-sample-corrected AIC and BIC on the M1 and M3 Competition datasets. Weighted forecast combinations perform better than forecasts selected using information criteria, in terms of both point forecast accuracy and prediction interval coverage. Simple combinations and weighted combinations do not consistently outperform one another, while simple combinations sometimes perform worse than single forecasts selected by information criteria. We find a tendency for a longer history to be associated with a better prediction interval coverage.

KW - AIC

KW - BIC

KW - Combining forecasts

KW - Information criteria

KW - Model selection

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 238

EP - 251

JO - International Journal of Forecasting

JF - International Journal of Forecasting

SN - 0169-2070

IS - 2

ER -