Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005):

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review

Published

Standard

Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes. / O'Reilly, Dermot.
In: Urban Studies, Vol. 44, No. 5-6, 05.2007, p. 1145-1153.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review

Harvard

O'Reilly, D 2007, 'Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes', Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 5-6, pp. 1145-1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701255973

APA

O'Reilly, D. (2007). Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes. Urban Studies, 44(5-6), 1145-1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701255973

Vancouver

O'Reilly D. Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes. Urban Studies. 2007 May;44(5-6):1145-1153. doi: 10.1080/00420980701255973

Author

O'Reilly, Dermot. / Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes. In: Urban Studies. 2007 ; Vol. 44, No. 5-6. pp. 1145-1153.

Bibtex

@article{f3fccfc233bf47a1bcf56e6addc15646,
title = "Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005):: Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes",
abstract = "This comment looks at the findings presented by Rhodes et al. (2005) in relation to the effects of seven SRB case studies on local outcomes. It questions their selective discussion of the positive outcomes relative to the national benchmarks they present and their aggregation of the theories of change, the outputs and the outcomes from the programme; it also raises some further methodological considerations relevant to the evaluation of area-based initiatives. In conclusion, this comment argues that the ability for evaluations of ABIs to show their precise contributions to outcomes is seriously constrained by both methodological and practical considerations.",
author = "Dermot O'Reilly",
year = "2007",
month = may,
doi = "10.1080/00420980701255973",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1145--1153",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5-6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005):

T2 - Some Further Thoughts on Assessing the Effects of Area-based Initiatives on Local Outcomes

AU - O'Reilly, Dermot

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - This comment looks at the findings presented by Rhodes et al. (2005) in relation to the effects of seven SRB case studies on local outcomes. It questions their selective discussion of the positive outcomes relative to the national benchmarks they present and their aggregation of the theories of change, the outputs and the outcomes from the programme; it also raises some further methodological considerations relevant to the evaluation of area-based initiatives. In conclusion, this comment argues that the ability for evaluations of ABIs to show their precise contributions to outcomes is seriously constrained by both methodological and practical considerations.

AB - This comment looks at the findings presented by Rhodes et al. (2005) in relation to the effects of seven SRB case studies on local outcomes. It questions their selective discussion of the positive outcomes relative to the national benchmarks they present and their aggregation of the theories of change, the outputs and the outcomes from the programme; it also raises some further methodological considerations relevant to the evaluation of area-based initiatives. In conclusion, this comment argues that the ability for evaluations of ABIs to show their precise contributions to outcomes is seriously constrained by both methodological and practical considerations.

U2 - 10.1080/00420980701255973

DO - 10.1080/00420980701255973

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 44

SP - 1145

EP - 1153

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 5-6

ER -