Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comments on: Land use for United States power g...

Electronic data

  • Comments on Land use for United States power generation

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112526, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526

    Accepted author manuscript, 796 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 18/05/24

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 143: 110911)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Rebecca R. Hernandez
  • Alexander E. Cagle
  • Steven M. Grodsky
  • Giles Exley
  • Sarah M. Jordaan
Close
Article number112526
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/09/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume166
Number of pages6
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date18/05/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Highlights

Wachs and Engel (2021) report outcomes describing energy-land relationships.


The methodological approaches in Wachs and Engel (2021) are absent.


Results presented in Wachs and Engel (2021) should be considered with caution.


Literature reviews and analyses on land-energy relationships should be rigorous.


Fair and open standardization of metrics for land-energy relationships are needed.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112526, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526