Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 143: 110911)

Lancaster Environment Centre

Electronic data

Comments on Land use for United States power generation
Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112526, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526
Accepted author manuscript, 796 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526
Final published version

Keywords

Energy, Land-use and land-cover change, Metrics, Renewable energy, Solar energy

View graph of relations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 143: 110911). / Hernandez, Rebecca R.; Cagle, Alexander E.; Grodsky, Steven M. et al.
In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 166, 112526, 30.09.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{a873f0fa618d4e5a95199cdb8eb5f886,

title = "Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 143: 110911)",

abstract = "Highlights•Wachs and Engel (2021) report outcomes describing energy-land relationships.•The methodological approaches in Wachs and Engel (2021) are absent.•Results presented in Wachs and Engel (2021) should be considered with caution.•Literature reviews and analyses on land-energy relationships should be rigorous.•Fair and open standardization of metrics for land-energy relationships are needed.",

keywords = "Energy, Land-use and land-cover change, Metrics, Renewable energy, Solar energy",

author = "Hernandez, {Rebecca R.} and Cagle, {Alexander E.} and Grodsky, {Steven M.} and Giles Exley and Jordaan, {Sarah M.}",

note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112526, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526",

language = "English",

volume = "166",

journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",

issn = "1364-0321",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on: Land use for United States power generation: A critical review of existing metrics with suggestions for going forward (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021; 143: 110911)

AU - Hernandez, Rebecca R.

AU - Cagle, Alexander E.

AU - Grodsky, Steven M.

AU - Exley, Giles

AU - Jordaan, Sarah M.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112526, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526

PY - 2022/9/30

Y1 - 2022/9/30

N2 - Highlights•Wachs and Engel (2021) report outcomes describing energy-land relationships.•The methodological approaches in Wachs and Engel (2021) are absent.•Results presented in Wachs and Engel (2021) should be considered with caution.•Literature reviews and analyses on land-energy relationships should be rigorous.•Fair and open standardization of metrics for land-energy relationships are needed.

AB - Highlights•Wachs and Engel (2021) report outcomes describing energy-land relationships.•The methodological approaches in Wachs and Engel (2021) are absent.•Results presented in Wachs and Engel (2021) should be considered with caution.•Literature reviews and analyses on land-energy relationships should be rigorous.•Fair and open standardization of metrics for land-energy relationships are needed.

KW - Energy

KW - Land-use and land-cover change

KW - Metrics

KW - Renewable energy

KW - Solar energy

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112526

M3 - Journal article

VL - 166

JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

M1 - 112526

ER -

Research

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords