Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison between a phenomenological approach ...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix. / Peng, Q.; Gorter, W. S.; Vermolen, F. J.
In: Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 30.06.2022, p. 919-935.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Peng, Q, Gorter, WS & Vermolen, FJ 2022, 'Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix', Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 919-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3

APA

Peng, Q., Gorter, W. S., & Vermolen, F. J. (2022). Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 21(3), 919-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3

Vancouver

Peng Q, Gorter WS, Vermolen FJ. Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology. 2022 Jun 30;21(3):919-935. Epub 2022 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3

Author

Peng, Q. ; Gorter, W. S. ; Vermolen, F. J. / Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix. In: Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology. 2022 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 919-935.

Bibtex

@article{1f6e932fdccc4e279c99d9b43cdf716d,
title = "Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix",
abstract = "Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.",
author = "Q. Peng and Gorter, {W. S.} and Vermolen, {F. J.}",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "919--935",
journal = "Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology",
issn = "1617-7959",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix

AU - Peng, Q.

AU - Gorter, W. S.

AU - Vermolen, F. J.

PY - 2022/6/30

Y1 - 2022/6/30

N2 - Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.

AB - Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525–2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.

U2 - 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3

DO - 10.1007/s10237-022-01568-3

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 919

EP - 935

JO - Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology

JF - Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology

SN - 1617-7959

IS - 3

ER -