Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of methods for the detection of grav...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars. / Walsh, S.; Pitkin, M.; Oliver, M. et al.
In: Physical Review D, Vol. 94, No. 12, 124010, 01.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Walsh, S, Pitkin, M, Oliver, M, D'Antonio, S, Dergachev, V, Królak, A, Astone, P, Bejger, M, Di Giovanni, M, Dorosh, O, Frasca, S, Leaci, P, Mastrogiovanni, S, Miller, A, Palomba, C, Papa, MA, Piccinni, OJ, Riles, K, Sauter, O & Sintes, AM 2016, 'Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars', Physical Review D, vol. 94, no. 12, 124010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010

APA

Walsh, S., Pitkin, M., Oliver, M., D'Antonio, S., Dergachev, V., Królak, A., Astone, P., Bejger, M., Di Giovanni, M., Dorosh, O., Frasca, S., Leaci, P., Mastrogiovanni, S., Miller, A., Palomba, C., Papa, M. A., Piccinni, O. J., Riles, K., Sauter, O., & Sintes, A. M. (2016). Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars. Physical Review D, 94(12), Article 124010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010

Vancouver

Walsh S, Pitkin M, Oliver M, D'Antonio S, Dergachev V, Królak A et al. Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars. Physical Review D. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):124010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010

Author

Walsh, S. ; Pitkin, M. ; Oliver, M. et al. / Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars. In: Physical Review D. 2016 ; Vol. 94, No. 12.

Bibtex

@article{c8730e90722244b6abf0355a39053f8d,
title = "Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars",
abstract = "Rapidly rotating neutron stars are promising sources of continuous gravitational wave radiation for the LIGO and Virgo interferometers. The majority of neutron stars in our galaxy have not been identified with electromagnetic observations. All-sky searches for isolated neutron stars offer the potential to detect gravitational waves from these unidentified sources. The parameter space of these blind all-sky searches, which also cover a large range of frequencies and frequency derivatives, presents a significant computational challenge. Different methods have been designed to perform these searches within acceptable computational limits. Here we describe the first benchmark in a project to compare the search methods currently available for the detection of unknown isolated neutron stars. The five methods compared here are individually referred to as the PowerFlux, sky Hough, frequency Hough, Einstein@Home, and time domain F-statistic methods. We employ a mock data challenge to compare the ability of each search method to recover signals simulated assuming a standard signal model. We find similar performance among the four quick-look search methods, while the more computationally intensive search method, Einstein@Home, achieves up to a factor of two higher sensitivity. We find that the absence of a second derivative frequency in the search parameter space does not degrade search sensitivity for signals with physically plausible second derivative frequencies. We also report on the parameter estimation accuracy of each search method, and the stability of the sensitivity in frequency and frequency derivative and in the presence of detector noise.",
author = "S. Walsh and M. Pitkin and M. Oliver and S. D'Antonio and V. Dergachev and A. Kr{\'o}lak and P. Astone and M. Bejger and {Di Giovanni}, M. and O. Dorosh and S. Frasca and P. Leaci and S. Mastrogiovanni and A. Miller and C. Palomba and Papa, {M. A.} and Piccinni, {O. J.} and K. Riles and O. Sauter and Sintes, {A. M.}",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
journal = "Physical Review D",
issn = "1550-7998",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for the detection of gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars

AU - Walsh, S.

AU - Pitkin, M.

AU - Oliver, M.

AU - D'Antonio, S.

AU - Dergachev, V.

AU - Królak, A.

AU - Astone, P.

AU - Bejger, M.

AU - Di Giovanni, M.

AU - Dorosh, O.

AU - Frasca, S.

AU - Leaci, P.

AU - Mastrogiovanni, S.

AU - Miller, A.

AU - Palomba, C.

AU - Papa, M. A.

AU - Piccinni, O. J.

AU - Riles, K.

AU - Sauter, O.

AU - Sintes, A. M.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Rapidly rotating neutron stars are promising sources of continuous gravitational wave radiation for the LIGO and Virgo interferometers. The majority of neutron stars in our galaxy have not been identified with electromagnetic observations. All-sky searches for isolated neutron stars offer the potential to detect gravitational waves from these unidentified sources. The parameter space of these blind all-sky searches, which also cover a large range of frequencies and frequency derivatives, presents a significant computational challenge. Different methods have been designed to perform these searches within acceptable computational limits. Here we describe the first benchmark in a project to compare the search methods currently available for the detection of unknown isolated neutron stars. The five methods compared here are individually referred to as the PowerFlux, sky Hough, frequency Hough, Einstein@Home, and time domain F-statistic methods. We employ a mock data challenge to compare the ability of each search method to recover signals simulated assuming a standard signal model. We find similar performance among the four quick-look search methods, while the more computationally intensive search method, Einstein@Home, achieves up to a factor of two higher sensitivity. We find that the absence of a second derivative frequency in the search parameter space does not degrade search sensitivity for signals with physically plausible second derivative frequencies. We also report on the parameter estimation accuracy of each search method, and the stability of the sensitivity in frequency and frequency derivative and in the presence of detector noise.

AB - Rapidly rotating neutron stars are promising sources of continuous gravitational wave radiation for the LIGO and Virgo interferometers. The majority of neutron stars in our galaxy have not been identified with electromagnetic observations. All-sky searches for isolated neutron stars offer the potential to detect gravitational waves from these unidentified sources. The parameter space of these blind all-sky searches, which also cover a large range of frequencies and frequency derivatives, presents a significant computational challenge. Different methods have been designed to perform these searches within acceptable computational limits. Here we describe the first benchmark in a project to compare the search methods currently available for the detection of unknown isolated neutron stars. The five methods compared here are individually referred to as the PowerFlux, sky Hough, frequency Hough, Einstein@Home, and time domain F-statistic methods. We employ a mock data challenge to compare the ability of each search method to recover signals simulated assuming a standard signal model. We find similar performance among the four quick-look search methods, while the more computationally intensive search method, Einstein@Home, achieves up to a factor of two higher sensitivity. We find that the absence of a second derivative frequency in the search parameter space does not degrade search sensitivity for signals with physically plausible second derivative frequencies. We also report on the parameter estimation accuracy of each search method, and the stability of the sensitivity in frequency and frequency derivative and in the presence of detector noise.

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 94

JO - Physical Review D

JF - Physical Review D

SN - 1550-7998

IS - 12

M1 - 124010

ER -