Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of User Intent for Mixed Reality and...

Electronic data

  • Comparison of User Intent for Mixed Reality and Augmented Reality in Hedonistic Shopping Experiences

    Accepted author manuscript, 852 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 5/09/25

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison of User Intent for Mixed Reality and Augmented Reality in Hedonistic Shopping Experiences

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date5/09/2023
Host publicationExtended Reality - International Conference, XR Salento 2023, Proceedings
EditorsLucio Tommaso De Paolis, Pasquale Arpaia, Marco Sacco
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages437-455
Number of pages19
ISBN (electronic)9783031434013
ISBN (print)9783031434006
<mark>Original language</mark>English
EventInternational Conference on Extended Reality: XR Salento 2023 - Lecce, Italy
Duration: 6/09/20239/09/2023
https://www.xrsalento.it/

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Extended Reality
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityLecce
Period6/09/239/09/23
Internet address

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume14218 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (electronic)1611-3349

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Extended Reality
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityLecce
Period6/09/239/09/23
Internet address

Abstract

A mismatch between user-technology usage and a lack of user acceptance hinders the adoption and diffusion of technology. In this research paper, we focus on the differences in how mixed reality (MR) and augmented reality (AR) impact user adoption. We also examine the importance of user intentions in relation to MR and AR for purchase behaviour. A survey (n = 801) was conducted in the UK in May 2022 to investigate the relationship between AR and MR technologies and compare their compatibility for various intentions, including intent to use (9 factors), intent to experience (7 factors), and intent to purchase (7 factors). The results indicate that MR shows more promise than AR in the retail industry. MR significantly and positively affected five elements, such as shopping, while AR was primarily used for gaming. This study provides practical insights that can aid in technology adoption and evaluation. It also emphasises the importance and feasibility of incorporating product customisation functionality into MR retail purchase applications, which has inspired our subsequent development of the MR user interface.