Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Competent and warm?

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Hansen_Rakic_Steffens_2016

    Rights statement: This article does not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal Experimental Psychology. It is not a copy of the original published article and is not suitable for citation. Copyright © 2017 Hogrefe Verlag. All rights reserved.

    Accepted author manuscript, 905 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Competent and warm?: how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Competent and warm? how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. / Hansen, Karolina; Rakić, Tamara; Steffens, Melanie C.
In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 27-36.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hansen K, Rakić T, Steffens MC. Competent and warm? how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. Experimental Psychology. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):27-36. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000348

Author

Hansen, Karolina ; Rakić, Tamara ; Steffens, Melanie C. / Competent and warm? how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions. In: Experimental Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 27-36.

Bibtex

@article{5b5bdb4a39f241db835bfd89f591ca49,
title = "Competent and warm?: how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions",
abstract = "Most research on ethnicity has focused on visual cues. However, accents are strong social cues that can match or contradict visual cues. We examined understudied reactions to people whose one cue suggests one ethnicity, whereas the other cue contradicts it. In an experiment conducted in Germany, job candidates spoke with an accent either congruent or incongruent with their (German or Turkish) appearance. Based on ethnolinguistic identity theory, we predicted that accents would be strong cues for categorization and evaluation. Based on expectancy violations theory we expected that incongruent targets would be evaluated more extremely than congruent targets. Both predictions were confirmed: Accents strongly influenced perceptions and Turkish-looking German-accented targets were perceived as most competent of all targets (and additionally most warm). The findings show that bringing together visual and auditory information yields a more complete picture of the processes underlying impression formation.",
keywords = "nonnative speech, stereotypes, ethnolinguistic identity, expectancy violations, impression formation, person perception",
author = "Karolina Hansen and Tamara Raki{\'c} and Steffens, {Melanie C.}",
note = "This article does not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal Experimental Psychology. It is not a copy of the original published article and is not suitable for citation. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Hogrefe Verlag. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000348",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "27--36",
journal = "Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1618-3169",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competent and warm?

T2 - how mismatching appearance and accent influence first impressions

AU - Hansen, Karolina

AU - Rakić, Tamara

AU - Steffens, Melanie C.

N1 - This article does not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal Experimental Psychology. It is not a copy of the original published article and is not suitable for citation. Copyright © 2017 Hogrefe Verlag. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Most research on ethnicity has focused on visual cues. However, accents are strong social cues that can match or contradict visual cues. We examined understudied reactions to people whose one cue suggests one ethnicity, whereas the other cue contradicts it. In an experiment conducted in Germany, job candidates spoke with an accent either congruent or incongruent with their (German or Turkish) appearance. Based on ethnolinguistic identity theory, we predicted that accents would be strong cues for categorization and evaluation. Based on expectancy violations theory we expected that incongruent targets would be evaluated more extremely than congruent targets. Both predictions were confirmed: Accents strongly influenced perceptions and Turkish-looking German-accented targets were perceived as most competent of all targets (and additionally most warm). The findings show that bringing together visual and auditory information yields a more complete picture of the processes underlying impression formation.

AB - Most research on ethnicity has focused on visual cues. However, accents are strong social cues that can match or contradict visual cues. We examined understudied reactions to people whose one cue suggests one ethnicity, whereas the other cue contradicts it. In an experiment conducted in Germany, job candidates spoke with an accent either congruent or incongruent with their (German or Turkish) appearance. Based on ethnolinguistic identity theory, we predicted that accents would be strong cues for categorization and evaluation. Based on expectancy violations theory we expected that incongruent targets would be evaluated more extremely than congruent targets. Both predictions were confirmed: Accents strongly influenced perceptions and Turkish-looking German-accented targets were perceived as most competent of all targets (and additionally most warm). The findings show that bringing together visual and auditory information yields a more complete picture of the processes underlying impression formation.

KW - nonnative speech

KW - stereotypes

KW - ethnolinguistic identity

KW - expectancy violations

KW - impression formation

KW - person perception

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000348

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000348

M3 - Journal article

VL - 64

SP - 27

EP - 36

JO - Experimental Psychology

JF - Experimental Psychology

SN - 1618-3169

IS - 1

ER -