Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conceptual Development in Higher Education Sust...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conceptual Development in Higher Education Sustainability Initiatives: Insights from a Change Laboratory Research Intervention

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Conceptual Development in Higher Education Sustainability Initiatives: Insights from a Change Laboratory Research Intervention. / Scahill, John; Bligh, Brett.
In: Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 9, 3968, 28.04.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1c4cf5b6ac354a6391caf2bdf7a6db71,
title = "Conceptual Development in Higher Education Sustainability Initiatives: Insights from a Change Laboratory Research Intervention",
abstract = "An international debate is taking place about embedding sustainability in higher education institutions (HEIs). Separate strands of literature address the importance of sustainability concepts and strategic change approaches. This paper explores conceptual development as an unfolding process within sustainability change initiatives. Data are derived from nine Change Laboratory workshops, conducted over 6 months, in which 20 stakeholders of varying backgrounds worked to create “a sustainable campus” in an HEI in Ireland. Transcribed video recordings and artefacts produced in workshops are analysed using activity theory principles to examine conceptual development, identifying four novel concepts created by stakeholders. The development of the Campus Sustainability Statement (CSS) concept is analysed in depth. It was produced in four stages of development—pursuing, in turn, a purposeful definition of “sustainability”, a shared framework to contextualise different actions, a mission statement for the campus, and the CSS proper. Each stage arose from a conflict of motives expressed within the coalition of participants, which was addressed by suggesting an abstract idea and considering its implications, with the latter stages also including attempts to embed and objectify the concept. Successive ideas were challenged, refined, and/or abandoned by participants on the grounds of ethics, fit with the institution, and relevance to subsequent action, with the eventual CSS judged to be an acceptable basis for institutional work. This paper emphasises the processual importance of developing sustainability concepts within institutions, including the creative potential for addressing value tensions and the possibility for nurturing new forms of collective agency.",
author = "John Scahill and Brett Bligh",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "28",
doi = "10.3390/su17093968",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual Development in Higher Education Sustainability Initiatives

T2 - Insights from a Change Laboratory Research Intervention

AU - Scahill, John

AU - Bligh, Brett

PY - 2025/4/28

Y1 - 2025/4/28

N2 - An international debate is taking place about embedding sustainability in higher education institutions (HEIs). Separate strands of literature address the importance of sustainability concepts and strategic change approaches. This paper explores conceptual development as an unfolding process within sustainability change initiatives. Data are derived from nine Change Laboratory workshops, conducted over 6 months, in which 20 stakeholders of varying backgrounds worked to create “a sustainable campus” in an HEI in Ireland. Transcribed video recordings and artefacts produced in workshops are analysed using activity theory principles to examine conceptual development, identifying four novel concepts created by stakeholders. The development of the Campus Sustainability Statement (CSS) concept is analysed in depth. It was produced in four stages of development—pursuing, in turn, a purposeful definition of “sustainability”, a shared framework to contextualise different actions, a mission statement for the campus, and the CSS proper. Each stage arose from a conflict of motives expressed within the coalition of participants, which was addressed by suggesting an abstract idea and considering its implications, with the latter stages also including attempts to embed and objectify the concept. Successive ideas were challenged, refined, and/or abandoned by participants on the grounds of ethics, fit with the institution, and relevance to subsequent action, with the eventual CSS judged to be an acceptable basis for institutional work. This paper emphasises the processual importance of developing sustainability concepts within institutions, including the creative potential for addressing value tensions and the possibility for nurturing new forms of collective agency.

AB - An international debate is taking place about embedding sustainability in higher education institutions (HEIs). Separate strands of literature address the importance of sustainability concepts and strategic change approaches. This paper explores conceptual development as an unfolding process within sustainability change initiatives. Data are derived from nine Change Laboratory workshops, conducted over 6 months, in which 20 stakeholders of varying backgrounds worked to create “a sustainable campus” in an HEI in Ireland. Transcribed video recordings and artefacts produced in workshops are analysed using activity theory principles to examine conceptual development, identifying four novel concepts created by stakeholders. The development of the Campus Sustainability Statement (CSS) concept is analysed in depth. It was produced in four stages of development—pursuing, in turn, a purposeful definition of “sustainability”, a shared framework to contextualise different actions, a mission statement for the campus, and the CSS proper. Each stage arose from a conflict of motives expressed within the coalition of participants, which was addressed by suggesting an abstract idea and considering its implications, with the latter stages also including attempts to embed and objectify the concept. Successive ideas were challenged, refined, and/or abandoned by participants on the grounds of ethics, fit with the institution, and relevance to subsequent action, with the eventual CSS judged to be an acceptable basis for institutional work. This paper emphasises the processual importance of developing sustainability concepts within institutions, including the creative potential for addressing value tensions and the possibility for nurturing new forms of collective agency.

U2 - 10.3390/su17093968

DO - 10.3390/su17093968

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 9

M1 - 3968

ER -