Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conciliation and meta-contrast are important fo...

Electronic data

  • POST PRINT - Levine & Philpot (2022)

    Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conciliation-and-metacontrast-are-important-for-understanding-how-people-assign-group-memberships-during-conflict-situations/D50B0DAC39A46CFE0D8B20C5E233F254 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, e112 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press

    Accepted author manuscript, 122 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Article numbere112
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>7/07/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume24
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on “attack,” when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.

Bibliographic note

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conciliation-and-metacontrast-are-important-for-understanding-how-people-assign-group-memberships-during-conflict-situations/D50B0DAC39A46CFE0D8B20C5E233F254 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, e112 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press.