Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conciliation and meta-contrast are important fo...

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • POST PRINT - Levine & Philpot (2022)

    Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conciliation-and-metacontrast-are-important-for-understanding-how-people-assign-group-memberships-during-conflict-situations/D50B0DAC39A46CFE0D8B20C5E233F254 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, e112 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press

    Accepted author manuscript, 122 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations. / Levine, Mark; Philpot, Richard.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 24, e112, 07.07.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Levine, M & Philpot, R 2022, 'Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 24, e112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2100131X

APA

Levine, M., & Philpot, R. (2022). Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, Article e112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2100131X

Vancouver

Levine M, Philpot R. Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2022 Jul 7;24:e112. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2100131X

Author

Levine, Mark ; Philpot, Richard. / Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2022 ; Vol. 24.

Bibtex

@article{0b69d02c63bc45e787f1cf8aae0389b5,
title = "Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations",
abstract = "Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on “attack,” when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.",
author = "Mark Levine and Richard Philpot",
note = "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conciliation-and-metacontrast-are-important-for-understanding-how-people-assign-group-memberships-during-conflict-situations/D50B0DAC39A46CFE0D8B20C5E233F254 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, e112 2022, {\textcopyright} 2022 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X2100131X",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conciliation and meta-contrast are important for understanding how people assign group memberships during conflict situations

AU - Levine, Mark

AU - Philpot, Richard

N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/conciliation-and-metacontrast-are-important-for-understanding-how-people-assign-group-memberships-during-conflict-situations/D50B0DAC39A46CFE0D8B20C5E233F254 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, e112 2022, © 2022 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2022/7/7

Y1 - 2022/7/7

N2 - Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on “attack,” when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.

AB - Pietraszewski misrepresents both the nature of behaviour in conflict and the ability of psychology to theorise the relational properties of group designation. At the behavioural level, he focusses exclusively on “attack,” when consolation/care in conflict is equally present and important. At the theoretical level, he ignores existing psychological work on how group perception is shaped by the meta-contrast principle.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X2100131X

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X2100131X

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

M1 - e112

ER -