Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Conscience and agent-integrity

Electronic data

  • FINAL_REVISED_VERSION_04_05_16

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Mary Neal, Sara Fovargue; Conscience and Agent-Integrity: A Defence of Conscience-Based Exemptions in the Health Care Context. Med Law Rev 2016; 24 (4): 544-570. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww023 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw/article/2623371/Conscience

    Accepted author manuscript, 296 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Conscience and agent-integrity: a defence of conscience-based exemptions in the health care context

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineEditorialpeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/12/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Medical Law Review
Issue number4
Volume24
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)544-570
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date8/12/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The issue of conscientious refusal by health care practitioners continues to attract attention from academics, and was the subject of a recent UK Supreme Court decision. Activism aimed at changing abortion law and the decision to devolve governance of abortion law to the Scottish Parliament both raise the prospect of altered provision for conscience in domestic law. In this article, building on earlier work, we argue that conscience is fundamentally connected to moral integrity and essential to the proper functioning of moral agency. We examine recent attempts to undermine the view of conscience as a matter of integrity and argue that these have been unsuccessful. With our view of conscience as a prerequisite for moral integrity and agency established and defended, we then take issue with the ‘incompatibility thesis’ (the claim that protection for conscience is incompatible with the professional obligations of healthcare practitioners). We reject each of the alternative premises on which the incompatibility thesis might rest, and challenge the assumption of a public/private divide which is entailed by all versions of the thesis. Finally, we raise concerns about the apparent blindness of the thesis to issues of power and privilege, and conclude that conscience merits robust protection.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Mary Neal, Sara Fovargue; Conscience and Agent-Integrity: A Defence of Conscience-Based Exemptions in the Health Care Context. Med Law Rev 2016; 24 (4): 544-570. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww023 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw/article/2623371/Conscience