Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History fro...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3. / LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration.
In: The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 949, No. 2, 76, 07.06.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration 2023, 'Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3', The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 949, no. 2, 76. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

APA

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration (2023). Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3. The Astrophysical Journal, 949(2), Article 76. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

Vancouver

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration. Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3. The Astrophysical Journal. 2023 Jun 7;949(2):76. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

Author

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration. / Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3. In: The Astrophysical Journal. 2023 ; Vol. 949, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{61253d1c40c7464f828a5a611b18e426,
title = "Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3",
abstract = "We use 47 gravitational wave sources from the Third LIGO–Virgo–Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC–3) to estimate the Hubble parameter H(z), including its current value, the Hubble constant H0. Each gravitational wave (GW) signal provides the luminosity distance to the source, and we estimate the corresponding redshift using two methods: the redshifted masses and a galaxy catalog. Using the binary black hole (BBH) redshifted masses, we simultaneously infer the source mass distribution and H(z). The source mass distribution displays a peak around 34 M⊙, followed by a drop-off. Assuming this mass scale does not evolve with the redshift results in a H(z) measurement, yielding ${H}_{0}={68}_{-8}^{+12}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ (68% credible interval) when combined with the H0 measurement from GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart. This represents an improvement of 17% with respect to the H0 estimate from GWTC–1. The second method associates each GW event with its probable host galaxy in the catalog GLADE+, statistically marginalizing over the redshifts of each event's potential hosts. Assuming a fixed BBH population, we estimate a value of ${H}_{0}={68}_{-6}^{+8}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ with the galaxy catalog method, an improvement of 42% with respect to our GWTC–1 result and 20% with respect to recent H0 studies using GWTC–2 events. However, we show that this result is strongly impacted by assumptions about the BBH source mass distribution; the only event which is not strongly impacted by such assumptions (and is thus informative about H0) is the well-localized event GW190814.",
author = "{LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration} and Amy Hewitt and Matthew Pitkin",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb",
language = "English",
volume = "949",
journal = "The Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "Institute of Physics Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC-3

AU - LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration

AU - Hewitt, Amy

AU - Pitkin, Matthew

PY - 2023/6/7

Y1 - 2023/6/7

N2 - We use 47 gravitational wave sources from the Third LIGO–Virgo–Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC–3) to estimate the Hubble parameter H(z), including its current value, the Hubble constant H0. Each gravitational wave (GW) signal provides the luminosity distance to the source, and we estimate the corresponding redshift using two methods: the redshifted masses and a galaxy catalog. Using the binary black hole (BBH) redshifted masses, we simultaneously infer the source mass distribution and H(z). The source mass distribution displays a peak around 34 M⊙, followed by a drop-off. Assuming this mass scale does not evolve with the redshift results in a H(z) measurement, yielding ${H}_{0}={68}_{-8}^{+12}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ (68% credible interval) when combined with the H0 measurement from GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart. This represents an improvement of 17% with respect to the H0 estimate from GWTC–1. The second method associates each GW event with its probable host galaxy in the catalog GLADE+, statistically marginalizing over the redshifts of each event's potential hosts. Assuming a fixed BBH population, we estimate a value of ${H}_{0}={68}_{-6}^{+8}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ with the galaxy catalog method, an improvement of 42% with respect to our GWTC–1 result and 20% with respect to recent H0 studies using GWTC–2 events. However, we show that this result is strongly impacted by assumptions about the BBH source mass distribution; the only event which is not strongly impacted by such assumptions (and is thus informative about H0) is the well-localized event GW190814.

AB - We use 47 gravitational wave sources from the Third LIGO–Virgo–Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC–3) to estimate the Hubble parameter H(z), including its current value, the Hubble constant H0. Each gravitational wave (GW) signal provides the luminosity distance to the source, and we estimate the corresponding redshift using two methods: the redshifted masses and a galaxy catalog. Using the binary black hole (BBH) redshifted masses, we simultaneously infer the source mass distribution and H(z). The source mass distribution displays a peak around 34 M⊙, followed by a drop-off. Assuming this mass scale does not evolve with the redshift results in a H(z) measurement, yielding ${H}_{0}={68}_{-8}^{+12}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ (68% credible interval) when combined with the H0 measurement from GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart. This represents an improvement of 17% with respect to the H0 estimate from GWTC–1. The second method associates each GW event with its probable host galaxy in the catalog GLADE+, statistically marginalizing over the redshifts of each event's potential hosts. Assuming a fixed BBH population, we estimate a value of ${H}_{0}={68}_{-6}^{+8}\,\mathrm{km}\ \,\ {{\rm{s}}}^{-1}\,{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ with the galaxy catalog method, an improvement of 42% with respect to our GWTC–1 result and 20% with respect to recent H0 studies using GWTC–2 events. However, we show that this result is strongly impacted by assumptions about the BBH source mass distribution; the only event which is not strongly impacted by such assumptions (and is thus informative about H0) is the well-localized event GW190814.

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac74bb

M3 - Journal article

VL - 949

JO - The Astrophysical Journal

JF - The Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

M1 - 76

ER -