Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Corporate Rescue Reanimated

Electronic data

  • CRR_2024_author_details

    Accepted author manuscript, 392 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Corporate Rescue Reanimated

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Corporate Rescue Reanimated. / Wood, John.
In: Journal of Business Law, 29.07.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Wood, J 2024, 'Corporate Rescue Reanimated', Journal of Business Law.

APA

Wood, J. (in press). Corporate Rescue Reanimated. Journal of Business Law.

Vancouver

Wood J. Corporate Rescue Reanimated. Journal of Business Law. 2024 Jul 29.

Author

Wood, John. / Corporate Rescue Reanimated. In: Journal of Business Law. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{dd49375606bd41afa9887484efdba281,
title = "Corporate Rescue Reanimated",
abstract = "The CIGA 2020 reforms designed to aid corporate rescue outcomes in the United Kingdom have had two significant effects. First, the implementation of the permanent measures contained in CIGA 2020 has further shifted the UK{\textquoteright}s insolvency framework towards a business rescue culture more associated with the debtor-in-possession model. Second, the introduction of a standalone moratorium along with the Part 26A restructuring plan has moved the focus further away from its traditional creditor-friendly approach to one that is pro-debtor. The extent and significance of both the creditor and debtor regimes and the policy direction created by CIGA 2020 is critiqued in this article. ",
author = "John Wood",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "29",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Business Law",
issn = "0021-9460",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate Rescue Reanimated

AU - Wood, John

PY - 2024/7/29

Y1 - 2024/7/29

N2 - The CIGA 2020 reforms designed to aid corporate rescue outcomes in the United Kingdom have had two significant effects. First, the implementation of the permanent measures contained in CIGA 2020 has further shifted the UK’s insolvency framework towards a business rescue culture more associated with the debtor-in-possession model. Second, the introduction of a standalone moratorium along with the Part 26A restructuring plan has moved the focus further away from its traditional creditor-friendly approach to one that is pro-debtor. The extent and significance of both the creditor and debtor regimes and the policy direction created by CIGA 2020 is critiqued in this article.

AB - The CIGA 2020 reforms designed to aid corporate rescue outcomes in the United Kingdom have had two significant effects. First, the implementation of the permanent measures contained in CIGA 2020 has further shifted the UK’s insolvency framework towards a business rescue culture more associated with the debtor-in-possession model. Second, the introduction of a standalone moratorium along with the Part 26A restructuring plan has moved the focus further away from its traditional creditor-friendly approach to one that is pro-debtor. The extent and significance of both the creditor and debtor regimes and the policy direction created by CIGA 2020 is critiqued in this article.

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Business Law

JF - Journal of Business Law

SN - 0021-9460

ER -