Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Correspondence between self- and good-manager d...
View graph of relations

Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions: examining stability and change over four decades

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions: examining stability and change over four decades. / Powell, Gary N.; Butterfield, D. Anthony.
In: Journal of Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, 09.2015, p. 1745-1773.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Powell GN, Butterfield DA. Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions: examining stability and change over four decades. Journal of Management. 2015 Sept;41(6):1745-1773. Epub 2012 Nov 28. doi: 10.1177/0149206312463939

Author

Powell, Gary N. ; Butterfield, D. Anthony. / Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions : examining stability and change over four decades. In: Journal of Management. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 1745-1773.

Bibtex

@article{f19e5279058b4b9b928213c89ac3208c,
title = "Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions: examining stability and change over four decades",
abstract = "Newly collected data from samples obtained from two different populations—undergraduate business students and part-time (i.e., evening) MBA students—were compared with data from samples obtained from the same two populations during each of the three previous decades (N = 1,818) to examine the correspondence between self-descriptions and descriptions of a “good manager.” Both stability and change in the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions were predicted. Providing strong support for stability, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions was greater for men than women for all data combined as well as for data collected at each point in time. However, despite changes in women{\textquoteright}s status and in views of effective leadership across the four decades in which data were collected, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions exhibited a lack of support for consistent change over time for women and men considered separately. Implications for the nature of the linkages among sex, gender, and leadership as well as implications for individuals and organizations are discussed.",
keywords = "diversity, gender, leadership, careers",
author = "Powell, {Gary N.} and Butterfield, {D. Anthony}",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1177/0149206312463939",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1745--1773",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions

T2 - examining stability and change over four decades

AU - Powell, Gary N.

AU - Butterfield, D. Anthony

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Newly collected data from samples obtained from two different populations—undergraduate business students and part-time (i.e., evening) MBA students—were compared with data from samples obtained from the same two populations during each of the three previous decades (N = 1,818) to examine the correspondence between self-descriptions and descriptions of a “good manager.” Both stability and change in the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions were predicted. Providing strong support for stability, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions was greater for men than women for all data combined as well as for data collected at each point in time. However, despite changes in women’s status and in views of effective leadership across the four decades in which data were collected, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions exhibited a lack of support for consistent change over time for women and men considered separately. Implications for the nature of the linkages among sex, gender, and leadership as well as implications for individuals and organizations are discussed.

AB - Newly collected data from samples obtained from two different populations—undergraduate business students and part-time (i.e., evening) MBA students—were compared with data from samples obtained from the same two populations during each of the three previous decades (N = 1,818) to examine the correspondence between self-descriptions and descriptions of a “good manager.” Both stability and change in the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions were predicted. Providing strong support for stability, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions was greater for men than women for all data combined as well as for data collected at each point in time. However, despite changes in women’s status and in views of effective leadership across the four decades in which data were collected, the correspondence between self- and good-manager descriptions exhibited a lack of support for consistent change over time for women and men considered separately. Implications for the nature of the linkages among sex, gender, and leadership as well as implications for individuals and organizations are discussed.

KW - diversity

KW - gender

KW - leadership

KW - careers

U2 - 10.1177/0149206312463939

DO - 10.1177/0149206312463939

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 1745

EP - 1773

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 6

ER -