Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey design...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs: Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs: Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program. / Minnery, Mark; Okoyo, Collins; Morgan, Grace et al.
In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 18, No. 12, e0011583, 02.12.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Minnery, M., Okoyo, C., Morgan, G., Wang, A., Johnson, O., Fronterre, C., Montresor, A., Campbell, S. J., Mwandawiro, C., & Diggle, P. (2024). Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs: Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 18(12), Article e0011583. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011583

Vancouver

Minnery M, Okoyo C, Morgan G, Wang A, Johnson O, Fronterre C et al. Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs: Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2024 Dec 2;18(12):e0011583. Epub 2024 Dec 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011583

Author

Minnery, Mark ; Okoyo, Collins ; Morgan, Grace et al. / Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs : Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program. In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2024 ; Vol. 18, No. 12.

Bibtex

@article{909e36d6090c401bb7c9bc6b7f25835d,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs: Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program",
abstract = "Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and schistosomiasis comprise the most wide-spread NTDs globally. Preventative chemotherapy is a cost-effective approach to controlling morbidity of both diseases, but relies on large scale surveys to determine and revise treatment frequency. Availability of detailed information on survey costs is limited despite recent methodological surveying innovations. We micro-costed a survey of STH and schistosomiasis in Kenya, and linked results to precision estimates of competing survey methods to compare cost-efficiency. Costs from a 2017 Kenyan parasitological survey were retrospectively analyzed and extrapolated to explore marginal changes when altering survey size, defined by the number of schools sampled and the number of samples taken per school. Subsequent costs were applied to simulated precision estimates of model-based geostatistical (MBG) and traditional survey designs. Cost-precision was calculated for a range of survey sizes per method. Four traditional survey design scenarios, based around WHO guidelines, were selected to act as reference cases for calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for MBG design. MBG designed surveys showed improved cost-precision, particularly if optimizing number of schools against samples per school. MBG was found to be more cost-effective under 87 of 92 comparisons to reference cases. This comprised 14 situations where MBG was both cheaper and more precise, 42 which had cost saving with precision trade off (ICERs; $8,915-$344,932 per percentage precision lost); and 31 more precise with increased cost (ICERs; $426-$147,748 per percentage precision gained). The remaining 5 comparisons represented extremes of MBG simulated site selection, unlikely to be applied in practice. Efficiency gains are possible for deworming surveys when considering cost alone, such as through minimizing sample or analysis costs. However further efficiency maximization is possible when designing surveys using MBG given its improved precision and ability to optimize the balance between number of schools and sample size per school. [Abstract copyright: Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Minnery et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.]",
author = "Mark Minnery and Collins Okoyo and Grace Morgan and Andrew Wang and Olatunji Johnson and Claudio Fronterre and Antonio Montresor and Campbell, {Suzy J} and Charles Mwandawiro and Peter Diggle",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pntd.0011583",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases",
issn = "1935-2727",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of comparative survey designs for helminth control programs

T2 - Post-hoc cost analysis and modelling of the Kenyan national school-based deworming program

AU - Minnery, Mark

AU - Okoyo, Collins

AU - Morgan, Grace

AU - Wang, Andrew

AU - Johnson, Olatunji

AU - Fronterre, Claudio

AU - Montresor, Antonio

AU - Campbell, Suzy J

AU - Mwandawiro, Charles

AU - Diggle, Peter

PY - 2024/12/2

Y1 - 2024/12/2

N2 - Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and schistosomiasis comprise the most wide-spread NTDs globally. Preventative chemotherapy is a cost-effective approach to controlling morbidity of both diseases, but relies on large scale surveys to determine and revise treatment frequency. Availability of detailed information on survey costs is limited despite recent methodological surveying innovations. We micro-costed a survey of STH and schistosomiasis in Kenya, and linked results to precision estimates of competing survey methods to compare cost-efficiency. Costs from a 2017 Kenyan parasitological survey were retrospectively analyzed and extrapolated to explore marginal changes when altering survey size, defined by the number of schools sampled and the number of samples taken per school. Subsequent costs were applied to simulated precision estimates of model-based geostatistical (MBG) and traditional survey designs. Cost-precision was calculated for a range of survey sizes per method. Four traditional survey design scenarios, based around WHO guidelines, were selected to act as reference cases for calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for MBG design. MBG designed surveys showed improved cost-precision, particularly if optimizing number of schools against samples per school. MBG was found to be more cost-effective under 87 of 92 comparisons to reference cases. This comprised 14 situations where MBG was both cheaper and more precise, 42 which had cost saving with precision trade off (ICERs; $8,915-$344,932 per percentage precision lost); and 31 more precise with increased cost (ICERs; $426-$147,748 per percentage precision gained). The remaining 5 comparisons represented extremes of MBG simulated site selection, unlikely to be applied in practice. Efficiency gains are possible for deworming surveys when considering cost alone, such as through minimizing sample or analysis costs. However further efficiency maximization is possible when designing surveys using MBG given its improved precision and ability to optimize the balance between number of schools and sample size per school. [Abstract copyright: Copyright: © 2024 Minnery et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.]

AB - Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and schistosomiasis comprise the most wide-spread NTDs globally. Preventative chemotherapy is a cost-effective approach to controlling morbidity of both diseases, but relies on large scale surveys to determine and revise treatment frequency. Availability of detailed information on survey costs is limited despite recent methodological surveying innovations. We micro-costed a survey of STH and schistosomiasis in Kenya, and linked results to precision estimates of competing survey methods to compare cost-efficiency. Costs from a 2017 Kenyan parasitological survey were retrospectively analyzed and extrapolated to explore marginal changes when altering survey size, defined by the number of schools sampled and the number of samples taken per school. Subsequent costs were applied to simulated precision estimates of model-based geostatistical (MBG) and traditional survey designs. Cost-precision was calculated for a range of survey sizes per method. Four traditional survey design scenarios, based around WHO guidelines, were selected to act as reference cases for calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for MBG design. MBG designed surveys showed improved cost-precision, particularly if optimizing number of schools against samples per school. MBG was found to be more cost-effective under 87 of 92 comparisons to reference cases. This comprised 14 situations where MBG was both cheaper and more precise, 42 which had cost saving with precision trade off (ICERs; $8,915-$344,932 per percentage precision lost); and 31 more precise with increased cost (ICERs; $426-$147,748 per percentage precision gained). The remaining 5 comparisons represented extremes of MBG simulated site selection, unlikely to be applied in practice. Efficiency gains are possible for deworming surveys when considering cost alone, such as through minimizing sample or analysis costs. However further efficiency maximization is possible when designing surveys using MBG given its improved precision and ability to optimize the balance between number of schools and sample size per school. [Abstract copyright: Copyright: © 2024 Minnery et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.]

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011583

DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011583

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39621813

VL - 18

JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

SN - 1935-2727

IS - 12

M1 - e0011583

ER -