Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk as...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol. / Svendsen, Camilla; Mathisen, Gro H.; Vist, Gunn E. et al.
In: Evidence-Based Toxicology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2371285, 31.12.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Svendsen, C, Mathisen, GH, Vist, GE, Husøy, T, Ames, HM, Beronius, A, Di Consiglio, E, Druwe, I, Hartung, T, Hoffmann, S, Hooijmans, CR, Machera, K, Robinson, JF, Roggen, E, Rooney, AA, Roth, N, Spilioti, E, Spyropoulou, A, Tcheremenskaia, O, Testai, E, Vinken, M & Whaley, P 2024, 'Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol', Evidence-Based Toxicology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2371285. https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285

APA

Svendsen, C., Mathisen, G. H., Vist, G. E., Husøy, T., Ames, H. M., Beronius, A., Di Consiglio, E., Druwe, I., Hartung, T., Hoffmann, S., Hooijmans, C. R., Machera, K., Robinson, J. F., Roggen, E., Rooney, A. A., Roth, N., Spilioti, E., Spyropoulou, A., Tcheremenskaia, O., ... Whaley, P. (2024). Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol. Evidence-Based Toxicology, 2(1), Article 2371285. https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285

Vancouver

Svendsen C, Mathisen GH, Vist GE, Husøy T, Ames HM, Beronius A et al. Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2024 Dec 31;2(1):2371285. Epub 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285

Author

Svendsen, Camilla ; Mathisen, Gro H. ; Vist, Gunn E. et al. / Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review : research protocol. In: Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2024 ; Vol. 2, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{2affe348ac054fc2b96a219be36bc546,
title = "Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review: research protocol",
abstract = "The focus on implementation of systematic review (SR) principles in chemical risk assessments (CRAs) is growing as it has the potential to advance the rigour and transparency of the CRAs. However, the SR and CRA communities use their own specific terminologies. Understanding the meaning of core SR and CRA terms and where they overlap is critical for application of SR methods and principles in CRAs. Moreover, it will increase the possibility for cross-sectorial collaboration, avoid misunderstandings, and improve communication among risk assessors, researchers, and policy makers. We present a process for the cross-mapping of core CRA terms and core SR terms. Core terms for study appraisal, evidence synthesis and integration used in the SR and CRA communities will be included. The outcome will be an overview of how core SR terms map onto core CRA terms and vice versa, and a description of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms. The cross-mapping is divided in three phases, where in the first phase the core SR and CRA terms will be identified. In the second phase, existing SR and CRA definitions will be mapped. In the third phase, descriptions of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms will be derived. The third phase will include weekly 1-h online meetings for SR and CRA experts.",
author = "Camilla Svendsen and Mathisen, {Gro H.} and Vist, {Gunn E.} and Trine Hus{\o}y and Ames, {Heather M.} and Anna Beronius and {Di Consiglio}, Emma and Ingrid Druwe and Thomas Hartung and Sebastian Hoffmann and Hooijmans, {Carlijn R.} and Kyriaki Machera and Robinson, {Joshua F.} and Erwin Roggen and Rooney, {Andrew A.} and Nicolas Roth and Eliana Spilioti and Anastasia Spyropoulou and Olga Tcheremenskaia and Emanuela Testai and Mathieu Vinken and Paul Whaley",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Evidence-Based Toxicology",
issn = "2833-373X",
publisher = "Informa UK Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-mapping of terms used in chemical risk assessment with those used in systematic review

T2 - research protocol

AU - Svendsen, Camilla

AU - Mathisen, Gro H.

AU - Vist, Gunn E.

AU - Husøy, Trine

AU - Ames, Heather M.

AU - Beronius, Anna

AU - Di Consiglio, Emma

AU - Druwe, Ingrid

AU - Hartung, Thomas

AU - Hoffmann, Sebastian

AU - Hooijmans, Carlijn R.

AU - Machera, Kyriaki

AU - Robinson, Joshua F.

AU - Roggen, Erwin

AU - Rooney, Andrew A.

AU - Roth, Nicolas

AU - Spilioti, Eliana

AU - Spyropoulou, Anastasia

AU - Tcheremenskaia, Olga

AU - Testai, Emanuela

AU - Vinken, Mathieu

AU - Whaley, Paul

PY - 2024/12/31

Y1 - 2024/12/31

N2 - The focus on implementation of systematic review (SR) principles in chemical risk assessments (CRAs) is growing as it has the potential to advance the rigour and transparency of the CRAs. However, the SR and CRA communities use their own specific terminologies. Understanding the meaning of core SR and CRA terms and where they overlap is critical for application of SR methods and principles in CRAs. Moreover, it will increase the possibility for cross-sectorial collaboration, avoid misunderstandings, and improve communication among risk assessors, researchers, and policy makers. We present a process for the cross-mapping of core CRA terms and core SR terms. Core terms for study appraisal, evidence synthesis and integration used in the SR and CRA communities will be included. The outcome will be an overview of how core SR terms map onto core CRA terms and vice versa, and a description of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms. The cross-mapping is divided in three phases, where in the first phase the core SR and CRA terms will be identified. In the second phase, existing SR and CRA definitions will be mapped. In the third phase, descriptions of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms will be derived. The third phase will include weekly 1-h online meetings for SR and CRA experts.

AB - The focus on implementation of systematic review (SR) principles in chemical risk assessments (CRAs) is growing as it has the potential to advance the rigour and transparency of the CRAs. However, the SR and CRA communities use their own specific terminologies. Understanding the meaning of core SR and CRA terms and where they overlap is critical for application of SR methods and principles in CRAs. Moreover, it will increase the possibility for cross-sectorial collaboration, avoid misunderstandings, and improve communication among risk assessors, researchers, and policy makers. We present a process for the cross-mapping of core CRA terms and core SR terms. Core terms for study appraisal, evidence synthesis and integration used in the SR and CRA communities will be included. The outcome will be an overview of how core SR terms map onto core CRA terms and vice versa, and a description of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms. The cross-mapping is divided in three phases, where in the first phase the core SR and CRA terms will be identified. In the second phase, existing SR and CRA definitions will be mapped. In the third phase, descriptions of the relationship and conceptual overlap between the terms will be derived. The third phase will include weekly 1-h online meetings for SR and CRA experts.

U2 - 10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285

DO - 10.1080/2833373x.2024.2371285

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

JO - Evidence-Based Toxicology

JF - Evidence-Based Toxicology

SN - 2833-373X

IS - 1

M1 - 2371285

ER -