Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Social Studies of Science, 48 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Social Studies of Science page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/sss on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 652 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultures of caring
T2 - healthcare ‘scandals’, inquiries, and the remaking of accountabilities
AU - Goodwin, Dawn Samantha
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Social Studies of Science, 48 (1), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Social Studies of Science page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/sss on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - In the UK, a series of high-profile healthcare ‘scandals’ and subsequent inquiries repeatedly point to the pivotal role culture plays in producing and sustaining healthcare failures. Inquiries are a sociotechnology of accountability that signal a shift in how personal accountabilities of healthcare professionals are being configured. In focusing on problematic organizational cultures, these inquiries acknowledge, make visible, and seek to distribute a collective responsibility for healthcare failures. In this article, I examine how the output of one particular inquiry – The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation – seeks to make culture visible and accountable. I question what it means to make culture accountable and show how the inquiry report enacts new and old forms of accountability: conventional forms that position actors as individuals, where actions or decisions have distinct boundaries that can be isolated from the ongoing flow of care, and transformative forms that bring into play a remote geographical location, the role of professional ideology, as well as a collective cultural responsibility.
AB - In the UK, a series of high-profile healthcare ‘scandals’ and subsequent inquiries repeatedly point to the pivotal role culture plays in producing and sustaining healthcare failures. Inquiries are a sociotechnology of accountability that signal a shift in how personal accountabilities of healthcare professionals are being configured. In focusing on problematic organizational cultures, these inquiries acknowledge, make visible, and seek to distribute a collective responsibility for healthcare failures. In this article, I examine how the output of one particular inquiry – The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation – seeks to make culture visible and accountable. I question what it means to make culture accountable and show how the inquiry report enacts new and old forms of accountability: conventional forms that position actors as individuals, where actions or decisions have distinct boundaries that can be isolated from the ongoing flow of care, and transformative forms that bring into play a remote geographical location, the role of professional ideology, as well as a collective cultural responsibility.
KW - accountability
KW - culture
KW - inquiries
KW - professional regulation
U2 - 10.1177/0306312717751051
DO - 10.1177/0306312717751051
M3 - Journal article
VL - 48
SP - 101
EP - 124
JO - Social Studies of Science
JF - Social Studies of Science
SN - 0306-3127
IS - 1
ER -