Final published version, 6.96 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis
}
TY - BOOK
T1 - Design and Analysis of Basket Clinical Trials
AU - Daniells, Libby
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The rise of precision medicine has ushered in the development of innovative clinical trial designs, notably basket trials, which assess the efficacy of a single therapeutic treatment across multiple disease types simultaneously, with each disease group forming a ‘basket’. Basket trials are advantageous as they allow testing of treatments on rare disease types which do not typically warrant their own investigation due to limited sample sizes. Small sample sizes can result in a lack of statistical power and precision of estimates. Bayesian information borrowing models can be implemented to improve inference by leveraging information from one basket when making inference in another. This thesis develops novel information borrowing methodology to improve power and reduce the type I error rate under various settings.This thesis first explores several existing Bayesian information borrowing models and proposes a novel data-driven adaptation. The models are investigated through simulation studies under numerous settings, including the often-overlooked unequal sample size case. Results indicate that the proposed approach better controls for a type I error, whilst yielding improved power. Approaches for the addition of new baskets to an ongoing trial are also proposed. Our findings demonstrate a substantial improvement in power in new baskets when information borrowing is utilised, though this comes with the risk of error inflation. We propose a novel calibration of efficacy criteria to mitigate this inflation. Simulation results show that implementing this calibration reduces error rates, with only a small loss in power in a few cases.Within the literature there are typically two avenues for information borrowing: borrowing between baskets on a trial or borrowing from historic data. We develop models that amalgamate both forms of borrowing. We show that the incorporation of historic data can improve power of estimates, whilst maintaining similar error rates to a method that ignores historic data.
AB - The rise of precision medicine has ushered in the development of innovative clinical trial designs, notably basket trials, which assess the efficacy of a single therapeutic treatment across multiple disease types simultaneously, with each disease group forming a ‘basket’. Basket trials are advantageous as they allow testing of treatments on rare disease types which do not typically warrant their own investigation due to limited sample sizes. Small sample sizes can result in a lack of statistical power and precision of estimates. Bayesian information borrowing models can be implemented to improve inference by leveraging information from one basket when making inference in another. This thesis develops novel information borrowing methodology to improve power and reduce the type I error rate under various settings.This thesis first explores several existing Bayesian information borrowing models and proposes a novel data-driven adaptation. The models are investigated through simulation studies under numerous settings, including the often-overlooked unequal sample size case. Results indicate that the proposed approach better controls for a type I error, whilst yielding improved power. Approaches for the addition of new baskets to an ongoing trial are also proposed. Our findings demonstrate a substantial improvement in power in new baskets when information borrowing is utilised, though this comes with the risk of error inflation. We propose a novel calibration of efficacy criteria to mitigate this inflation. Simulation results show that implementing this calibration reduces error rates, with only a small loss in power in a few cases.Within the literature there are typically two avenues for information borrowing: borrowing between baskets on a trial or borrowing from historic data. We develop models that amalgamate both forms of borrowing. We show that the incorporation of historic data can improve power of estimates, whilst maintaining similar error rates to a method that ignores historic data.
KW - Clinical Trial
KW - Basket Trials
KW - Adaptive design
KW - Bayesian Borrowing
U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2608
DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2608
M3 - Doctoral Thesis
PB - Lancaster University
ER -