Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Designing With or Against Institutions?

Electronic data

  • penultime version_MD article

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design and Culture on 22/08/2022, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957

    Accepted author manuscript, 330 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Designing With or Against Institutions?: Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Designing With or Against Institutions? Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities. / Dore, Mayane.
In: Design and Culture, Vol. 15, No. 1, 31.01.2023, p. 27-47.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dore M. Designing With or Against Institutions? Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities. Design and Culture. 2023 Jan 31;15(1):27-47. Epub 2022 Aug 22. doi: 10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957

Author

Bibtex

@article{2697d5c56e1f419880abee4a36e2f542,
title = "Designing With or Against Institutions?: Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities",
abstract = "This article explores growing concerns behind the potential instrumentalization of participatory design within democratic institutions and city-making projects. Drawing on ethnographic data collected during a participatory urban redevelopment in Sydney, it analyzes the wider political, economic, and cultural dynamics shaping participatory design (PD) in contested urban spaces. As a result, the article reflects on the institutional frameworks that challenged the democratic claims of PD, analyzing three interdependent levels of institutional constraints: ideology, governance, and narratives. In doing so, the article interrogates the role of expert-led urban governance, of neoliberal ideologies, and the power/knowledge relations in the building of a consensus narrative. Finally, the article concludes by highlighting the contingency of the so-called constraints, exploring an alternative conceptualization of institutions as social relations. Following this approach, designers may challenge constraints and simultaneously work with, against, and beyond institutions.",
keywords = "participatory design, codesign, institutioning, urban planning, Sydney, neoliberal urbanism",
author = "Mayane Dore",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design and Culture on 22/08/2022, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "27--47",
journal = "Design and Culture",
issn = "1754-7075",
publisher = "Bloomsbury",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing With or Against Institutions?

T2 - Dilemmas of Participatory Design in Contested Cities

AU - Dore, Mayane

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design and Culture on 22/08/2022, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957

PY - 2023/1/31

Y1 - 2023/1/31

N2 - This article explores growing concerns behind the potential instrumentalization of participatory design within democratic institutions and city-making projects. Drawing on ethnographic data collected during a participatory urban redevelopment in Sydney, it analyzes the wider political, economic, and cultural dynamics shaping participatory design (PD) in contested urban spaces. As a result, the article reflects on the institutional frameworks that challenged the democratic claims of PD, analyzing three interdependent levels of institutional constraints: ideology, governance, and narratives. In doing so, the article interrogates the role of expert-led urban governance, of neoliberal ideologies, and the power/knowledge relations in the building of a consensus narrative. Finally, the article concludes by highlighting the contingency of the so-called constraints, exploring an alternative conceptualization of institutions as social relations. Following this approach, designers may challenge constraints and simultaneously work with, against, and beyond institutions.

AB - This article explores growing concerns behind the potential instrumentalization of participatory design within democratic institutions and city-making projects. Drawing on ethnographic data collected during a participatory urban redevelopment in Sydney, it analyzes the wider political, economic, and cultural dynamics shaping participatory design (PD) in contested urban spaces. As a result, the article reflects on the institutional frameworks that challenged the democratic claims of PD, analyzing three interdependent levels of institutional constraints: ideology, governance, and narratives. In doing so, the article interrogates the role of expert-led urban governance, of neoliberal ideologies, and the power/knowledge relations in the building of a consensus narrative. Finally, the article concludes by highlighting the contingency of the so-called constraints, exploring an alternative conceptualization of institutions as social relations. Following this approach, designers may challenge constraints and simultaneously work with, against, and beyond institutions.

KW - participatory design

KW - codesign

KW - institutioning

KW - urban planning

KW - Sydney

KW - neoliberal urbanism

U2 - 10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957

DO - 10.1080/17547075.2022.2103957

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 27

EP - 47

JO - Design and Culture

JF - Design and Culture

SN - 1754-7075

IS - 1

ER -