Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Determinants of treatment-seeking behaviour and...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Determinants of treatment-seeking behaviour and healthcare provider choice in Afghanistan in 2018: a cross-sectional study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Margo van Gurp
  • Mohammad Haris Abdianwall
  • Sohrab Safi
  • Sayed Ataullah Saeedzai
  • Konrad T Juszkiewicz
  • Sayed Rahim Arab
  • Egbert Sondorp
  • Sandra Alba
Close
Article numbere000904
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>27/11/2024
<mark>Journal</mark>BMJ Public Health
Issue number2
Volume2
Number of pages12
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Introduction: In Afghanistan, remarkable achievements have been made in improving access to healthcare and health outcomes since the introduction of essential healthcare packages. Nonetheless, sociodemographic and geographical inequities persist, and out-of-pocket expenditures are high. This study investigates the client and provider determinants of access to care that affect treatment-seeking behaviour in 2018. Methods: Secondary data analysis using data on treatment-seeking behaviour in public and private healthcare from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 was combined with data on the quality of public healthcare facilities from a national healthcare facility assessment of the same year. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore associations between client characteristics and accessibility of public healthcare facilities, and treatment-seeking behaviour and choice of public versus private healthcare provider. Results: The results suggest that the odds of seeking treatment are lowest among the rural poor. The odds of treatment-seeking and choosing a public healthcare provider are higher for pregnancy-related health needs but lower for chronic conditions. Affordability of healthcare was associated with lower odds of treatment-seeking (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and using private healthcare providers (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99). Increased satisfaction with opening hours (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) and availability of a female nurse or doctor (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04) in public health facilities, and a higher level of trust in healthcare provider (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06) were associated with higher odds of using public healthcare. Conclusion: Afghanistan’s public healthcare system is vital in providing care to the economically disadvantaged and managing infectious diseases and maternal health problems. The private sector plays a dominant role, particularly for those illnesses not covered under the essential healthcare packages. The study suggests opportunities for the public healthcare system to alleviate financial barriers to healthcare access and broaden its service offerings to encompass the management of chronic illnesses.