Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Development of a resource allocation formula fo...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services. / Jones, A.; Hayhurst, K.P.; Whittaker, W. et al.
In: Journal of Public Health, Vol. 40, No. 3, 23.11.2017, p. 396-404.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jones, A, Hayhurst, KP, Whittaker, W, Mason, T & Sutton, M 2017, 'Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services', Journal of Public Health, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx160

APA

Jones, A., Hayhurst, K. P., Whittaker, W., Mason, T., & Sutton, M. (2017). Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services. Journal of Public Health, 40(3), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx160

Vancouver

Jones A, Hayhurst KP, Whittaker W, Mason T, Sutton M. Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services. Journal of Public Health. 2017 Nov 23;40(3):396-404. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx160

Author

Jones, A. ; Hayhurst, K.P. ; Whittaker, W. et al. / Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services. In: Journal of Public Health. 2017 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 396-404.

Bibtex

@article{12775da2150148e2b82e62bd15c06b68,
title = "Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services",
abstract = "BackgroundFunding for substance misuse services comprises one-third of Public Health spend in England. The current allocation formula contains adjustments for actual activity, performance and need, proxied by the Standardized Mortality Ratio for under-75s (SMR < 75). Additional measures, such as deprivation, may better identify differential service need.MethodsWe developed an age-standardized and an age-stratified model (over-18s, under-18s), with the outcome of expected/actual cost at postal sector/Local Authority level. A third, person-based model incorporated predictors of costs at the individual level. Each model incorporated both needs and supply variables, with the relative effects of their inclusion assessed.ResultsMean estimated annual cost (2013/14) per English Local Authority area was £5 032 802 (sd: 3 951 158). Costs for drug misuse treatment represented the majority (83%) of costs. Models achieved adjusted R-squared values of 0.522 (age-standardized), 0.533 (age-stratified over-18s), 0.232 (age-stratified under-18s) and 0.470 (person-based).ConclusionImprovements can be made to the existing resource allocation formulae to better reflect population need. The person-based model permits inclusion of a range of needs variables, in addition to strong predictors of cost based on the receipt of treatment in the previous year. Adoption of this revised person-based formula for substance misuse would shift resources towards more deprived areas.",
author = "A. Jones and K.P. Hayhurst and W. Whittaker and T. Mason and M. Sutton",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdx160",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "396--404",
journal = "Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1741-3842",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a resource allocation formula for substance misuse treatment services

AU - Jones, A.

AU - Hayhurst, K.P.

AU - Whittaker, W.

AU - Mason, T.

AU - Sutton, M.

PY - 2017/11/23

Y1 - 2017/11/23

N2 - BackgroundFunding for substance misuse services comprises one-third of Public Health spend in England. The current allocation formula contains adjustments for actual activity, performance and need, proxied by the Standardized Mortality Ratio for under-75s (SMR < 75). Additional measures, such as deprivation, may better identify differential service need.MethodsWe developed an age-standardized and an age-stratified model (over-18s, under-18s), with the outcome of expected/actual cost at postal sector/Local Authority level. A third, person-based model incorporated predictors of costs at the individual level. Each model incorporated both needs and supply variables, with the relative effects of their inclusion assessed.ResultsMean estimated annual cost (2013/14) per English Local Authority area was £5 032 802 (sd: 3 951 158). Costs for drug misuse treatment represented the majority (83%) of costs. Models achieved adjusted R-squared values of 0.522 (age-standardized), 0.533 (age-stratified over-18s), 0.232 (age-stratified under-18s) and 0.470 (person-based).ConclusionImprovements can be made to the existing resource allocation formulae to better reflect population need. The person-based model permits inclusion of a range of needs variables, in addition to strong predictors of cost based on the receipt of treatment in the previous year. Adoption of this revised person-based formula for substance misuse would shift resources towards more deprived areas.

AB - BackgroundFunding for substance misuse services comprises one-third of Public Health spend in England. The current allocation formula contains adjustments for actual activity, performance and need, proxied by the Standardized Mortality Ratio for under-75s (SMR < 75). Additional measures, such as deprivation, may better identify differential service need.MethodsWe developed an age-standardized and an age-stratified model (over-18s, under-18s), with the outcome of expected/actual cost at postal sector/Local Authority level. A third, person-based model incorporated predictors of costs at the individual level. Each model incorporated both needs and supply variables, with the relative effects of their inclusion assessed.ResultsMean estimated annual cost (2013/14) per English Local Authority area was £5 032 802 (sd: 3 951 158). Costs for drug misuse treatment represented the majority (83%) of costs. Models achieved adjusted R-squared values of 0.522 (age-standardized), 0.533 (age-stratified over-18s), 0.232 (age-stratified under-18s) and 0.470 (person-based).ConclusionImprovements can be made to the existing resource allocation formulae to better reflect population need. The person-based model permits inclusion of a range of needs variables, in addition to strong predictors of cost based on the receipt of treatment in the previous year. Adoption of this revised person-based formula for substance misuse would shift resources towards more deprived areas.

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdx160

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdx160

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 396

EP - 404

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 3

ER -