Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish intera...
View graph of relations

Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish interactions: signalling alignment through anaphor selection

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish interactions: signalling alignment through anaphor selection. / Rios Garcia, Carmen.
In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 183-197.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rios Garcia C. Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish interactions: signalling alignment through anaphor selection. Journal of Pragmatics. 2011 Jan;43(1):183-197. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.027

Author

Bibtex

@article{474cb7a681c841c49b798c3f723756b4,
title = "Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish interactions: signalling alignment through anaphor selection",
abstract = "In spoken interactions in Peninsular Spanish, a degree of active collaboration is displayed by listeners which seems greater than that present in exchanges between English-speaking interlocutors. This article examines the range of strategies used by Peninsular Spanish listeners to signal engagement with the speaker through their interpretation, disambiguation, and convergent use of anaphors. While in some instances the choice of anaphor is predicted by the general pattern of anaphora, there are instances of successful anaphor resolution achieved via lack of pronominal agreement, particularly in cases of associative anaphora.Explanations of the use of full NPs in Peninsular Spanish in contexts where the general theory of anaphora would predict a reduced anaphoric form tend to rely on neo-Gricean accounts of referential markedness. However, their appearance in non-ambiguous contexts suggests that in Peninsular Spanish interactions the need to establish affiliation overrides neo-Gricean and cognitive predictions on anaphor distribution. Shifts in pronominal agreement can also reflect fluctuations in the speaker's stance, which are replicated by the listener. Anaphoric alignment is also perceived in a range of allo-repetitions whose structure, at both intra- and intersentential levels, is a signal of interactional convergence.It is argued that anaphor choice can function as an alignment-marker, overriding both grammatical constraints on agreement and markedness predictions.",
keywords = "NP-anaphora, Return pop , Bridging , Allo-repetition , Alignment",
author = "{Rios Garcia}, Carmen",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.027",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "183--197",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse anaphora in Peninsular Spanish interactions

T2 - signalling alignment through anaphor selection

AU - Rios Garcia, Carmen

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - In spoken interactions in Peninsular Spanish, a degree of active collaboration is displayed by listeners which seems greater than that present in exchanges between English-speaking interlocutors. This article examines the range of strategies used by Peninsular Spanish listeners to signal engagement with the speaker through their interpretation, disambiguation, and convergent use of anaphors. While in some instances the choice of anaphor is predicted by the general pattern of anaphora, there are instances of successful anaphor resolution achieved via lack of pronominal agreement, particularly in cases of associative anaphora.Explanations of the use of full NPs in Peninsular Spanish in contexts where the general theory of anaphora would predict a reduced anaphoric form tend to rely on neo-Gricean accounts of referential markedness. However, their appearance in non-ambiguous contexts suggests that in Peninsular Spanish interactions the need to establish affiliation overrides neo-Gricean and cognitive predictions on anaphor distribution. Shifts in pronominal agreement can also reflect fluctuations in the speaker's stance, which are replicated by the listener. Anaphoric alignment is also perceived in a range of allo-repetitions whose structure, at both intra- and intersentential levels, is a signal of interactional convergence.It is argued that anaphor choice can function as an alignment-marker, overriding both grammatical constraints on agreement and markedness predictions.

AB - In spoken interactions in Peninsular Spanish, a degree of active collaboration is displayed by listeners which seems greater than that present in exchanges between English-speaking interlocutors. This article examines the range of strategies used by Peninsular Spanish listeners to signal engagement with the speaker through their interpretation, disambiguation, and convergent use of anaphors. While in some instances the choice of anaphor is predicted by the general pattern of anaphora, there are instances of successful anaphor resolution achieved via lack of pronominal agreement, particularly in cases of associative anaphora.Explanations of the use of full NPs in Peninsular Spanish in contexts where the general theory of anaphora would predict a reduced anaphoric form tend to rely on neo-Gricean accounts of referential markedness. However, their appearance in non-ambiguous contexts suggests that in Peninsular Spanish interactions the need to establish affiliation overrides neo-Gricean and cognitive predictions on anaphor distribution. Shifts in pronominal agreement can also reflect fluctuations in the speaker's stance, which are replicated by the listener. Anaphoric alignment is also perceived in a range of allo-repetitions whose structure, at both intra- and intersentential levels, is a signal of interactional convergence.It is argued that anaphor choice can function as an alignment-marker, overriding both grammatical constraints on agreement and markedness predictions.

KW - NP-anaphora

KW - Return pop

KW - Bridging

KW - Allo-repetition

KW - Alignment

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.027

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 183

EP - 197

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

IS - 1

ER -