Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disrupting the self

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Disrupting the self: self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Disrupting the self: self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process. / Jones, Craig; Huddlestone, Emma.
In: Higher Education Research and Development, 04.03.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jones C, Huddlestone E. Disrupting the self: self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process. Higher Education Research and Development. 2025 Mar 4. Epub 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2025.2467894

Author

Jones, Craig ; Huddlestone, Emma. / Disrupting the self : self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process. In: Higher Education Research and Development. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{07c97e84a706407d9f8f8ae174c9af53,
title = "Disrupting the self: self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process",
abstract = "There is significant academic interest in the impacts of research upon the researcher. Discussions have ranged from how shifting power geometries of research encounters can instil discomfort for the researcher to the prolonged effects our fieldwork and subsequent analysis can bring to bear. Such issues incorporate the need for effective self-care to manage the impacts of sensitive, challenging, or distressing research experiences. Whilst this literature is a welcome intervention, focus tends towards external stimuli: moments, topics, or interactions that instigate feelings of discomfort. Comparatively, literature deliberating the far more intimate modes of disruption to a sense of self that research can engender is more limited. In response, this paper presents reflexive accounts of how self-identity can be disrupted and provides some critical reflexive questions that PhD researchers may contemplate throughout their research to help alleviate some of the emotional labour discomfort may entail.",
keywords = "Reflexivity, Emotional labour, Liminality, Discomfort, (Un)Becoming",
author = "Craig Jones and Emma Huddlestone",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2025.2467894",
language = "English",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disrupting the self

T2 - self-identity, discomfort, and (un)becoming through the research process

AU - Jones, Craig

AU - Huddlestone, Emma

PY - 2025/3/4

Y1 - 2025/3/4

N2 - There is significant academic interest in the impacts of research upon the researcher. Discussions have ranged from how shifting power geometries of research encounters can instil discomfort for the researcher to the prolonged effects our fieldwork and subsequent analysis can bring to bear. Such issues incorporate the need for effective self-care to manage the impacts of sensitive, challenging, or distressing research experiences. Whilst this literature is a welcome intervention, focus tends towards external stimuli: moments, topics, or interactions that instigate feelings of discomfort. Comparatively, literature deliberating the far more intimate modes of disruption to a sense of self that research can engender is more limited. In response, this paper presents reflexive accounts of how self-identity can be disrupted and provides some critical reflexive questions that PhD researchers may contemplate throughout their research to help alleviate some of the emotional labour discomfort may entail.

AB - There is significant academic interest in the impacts of research upon the researcher. Discussions have ranged from how shifting power geometries of research encounters can instil discomfort for the researcher to the prolonged effects our fieldwork and subsequent analysis can bring to bear. Such issues incorporate the need for effective self-care to manage the impacts of sensitive, challenging, or distressing research experiences. Whilst this literature is a welcome intervention, focus tends towards external stimuli: moments, topics, or interactions that instigate feelings of discomfort. Comparatively, literature deliberating the far more intimate modes of disruption to a sense of self that research can engender is more limited. In response, this paper presents reflexive accounts of how self-identity can be disrupted and provides some critical reflexive questions that PhD researchers may contemplate throughout their research to help alleviate some of the emotional labour discomfort may entail.

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Emotional labour

KW - Liminality

KW - Discomfort

KW - (Un)Becoming

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2025.2467894

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2025.2467894

M3 - Journal article

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

ER -