Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

Electronic data

  • Jones_Brandt_accepted_JCL

    Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 694 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/11/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Child Language
Issue number6
Volume46
Number of pages14
Pages (from-to)1260-1273
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date10/09/19
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract


Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.

Bibliographic note

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.