Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.
Accepted author manuscript, 694 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?
AU - Jones, Sam
AU - Brandt, Silke
N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2019/11/30
Y1 - 2019/11/30
N2 - Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.
AB - Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.
U2 - 10.1017/S0305000919000473
DO - 10.1017/S0305000919000473
M3 - Journal article
VL - 46
SP - 1260
EP - 1273
JO - Journal of Child Language
JF - Journal of Child Language
SN - 0305-0009
IS - 6
ER -