Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

Electronic data

  • Jones_Brandt_accepted_JCL

    Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 694 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods? / Jones, Sam; Brandt, Silke.
In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 46, No. 6, 30.11.2019, p. 1260-1273.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jones S, Brandt S. Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods? Journal of Child Language. 2019 Nov 30;46(6):1260-1273. Epub 2019 Sept 10. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000473

Author

Jones, Sam ; Brandt, Silke. / Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?. In: Journal of Child Language. 2019 ; Vol. 46, No. 6. pp. 1260-1273.

Bibtex

@article{a8555ddb637e4e2691e136ee9e6ebbce,
title = "Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?",
abstract = "Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.",
author = "Sam Jones and Silke Brandt",
note = "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, {\textcopyright} 2019 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1017/S0305000919000473",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1260--1273",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?

AU - Jones, Sam

AU - Brandt, Silke

N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/do-children-really-acquire-dense-neighbourhoods/5EC4F9FCCF86F035FCBA046B6A2CEB68 The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal of Child Language, 46 (6), pp 1260-1273 2019, © 2019 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2019/11/30

Y1 - 2019/11/30

N2 - Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.

AB - Children learn high phonological neighbourhood density words more easily than low phonological neighbourhood density words (Storkel, 2004). However, the strength of this effect relative to alternative predictors of word acquisition is unclear. We addressed this issue using communicative inventory data from 300 British English-speaking children aged 12 to 25 months. Using Bayesian regression, we modelled word understanding and production as a function of: (i) phonological neighbourhood density, (ii) frequency, (iii) length, (iv) babiness, (v) concreteness, (vi) valence, (vii) arousal, and (viii) dominance. Phonological neighbourhood density predicted word production but not word comprehension, and this effect was stronger in younger children.

U2 - 10.1017/S0305000919000473

DO - 10.1017/S0305000919000473

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 1260

EP - 1273

JO - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 6

ER -