Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education on 21/03/2018, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2018.1450851
Accepted author manuscript, 893 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does merging improve efficiency? A study of English universities
AU - Papadimitriou, Maria
AU - Johnes, Jill
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education on 21/03/2018, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2018.1450851
PY - 2018/3/21
Y1 - 2018/3/21
N2 - This paper focuses on the effect of merger on university efficiency. In a first stage analysis, efficiency scores of English universities are derived for a 17-year period using the frontier estimation method data envelopment analysis. A second stage analysis explores the effect of merger and other factors on efficiency. We find that mean efficiency for the sector has varied from around 60% to 70%, but that the efficiency levels of the vast majority of individual higher education institutions (HEIs) are not significantly different from each other. Merged HEIs have an efficiencywhich is around five percentage points higher post-merger than nonmerging HEIs holding all else constant; but we find that the efficiency impact of merger does not last long (not more than a year) after the merger. The transitory nature of the efficiency gain is an important finding which should be noted by politicians and managers considering a policy of merger.
AB - This paper focuses on the effect of merger on university efficiency. In a first stage analysis, efficiency scores of English universities are derived for a 17-year period using the frontier estimation method data envelopment analysis. A second stage analysis explores the effect of merger and other factors on efficiency. We find that mean efficiency for the sector has varied from around 60% to 70%, but that the efficiency levels of the vast majority of individual higher education institutions (HEIs) are not significantly different from each other. Merged HEIs have an efficiencywhich is around five percentage points higher post-merger than nonmerging HEIs holding all else constant; but we find that the efficiency impact of merger does not last long (not more than a year) after the merger. The transitory nature of the efficiency gain is an important finding which should be noted by politicians and managers considering a policy of merger.
KW - Mergers
KW - Higher education
KW - EFFICIENCY
U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1450851
DO - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1450851
M3 - Journal article
JO - Studies in Higher Education
JF - Studies in Higher Education
SN - 0307-5079
ER -