Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemi...
View graph of relations

Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech?: evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. / Gablasova, Dana; Brezina, Vaclav.

Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. ed. / Jesús Romero-Trillo. Vol. 3 Springer, 2015. p. 117-136 (Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ; Vol. 3).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Gablasova, D & Brezina, V 2015, Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. in J Romero-Trillo (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. vol. 3, Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics , vol. 3, Springer, pp. 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6

APA

Gablasova, D., & Brezina, V. (2015). Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 (Vol. 3, pp. 117-136). (Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ; Vol. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6

Vancouver

Gablasova D, Brezina V. Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In Romero-Trillo J, editor, Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. Vol. 3. Springer. 2015. p. 117-136. (Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6

Author

Gablasova, Dana ; Brezina, Vaclav. / Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015. editor / Jesús Romero-Trillo. Vol. 3 Springer, 2015. pp. 117-136 (Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ).

Bibtex

@inbook{9cb6924656604ddb87d1e673ca17ef74,
title = "Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech?: evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus",
abstract = "This study investigates stance-taking strategies in a context of an examination of spoken English. The focus of the research is on the interaction between the candidates (advanced L2 speakers) and the examiners (L1 speakers of English). In particular, the study explores the use of epistemic adverbial markers such as {\textquoteleft}maybe{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}certainly{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}surely{\textquoteright}. These markers are used not only to express speakers{\textquoteright} position (certainty or uncertainty) towards a statement, but also to express speakers{\textquoteright} position towards other interlocutors (e.g. to manage interpersonal relationships or to downplay strong assertions). The study is based on the advanced subsection of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus of spoken L2 production which currently contains approximately 0.45M words based on four speaking tasks: one mostly monologic task and three highly interactive tasks. The study compares the expression of epistemic stance by both the candidates and examiners and explains the differences between speakers{\textquoteright} performance in terms of different speaker roles assumed by the candidates and examiners in three dialogic tasks. The study stresses the importance of looking at the contextual factors of speakers{\textquoteright} pragmatic choices and demonstrates that when studying L2 spoken production it is important to go beyond characterising the speakers as {\textquoteleft}native{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}non-native{\textquoteright} speakers of a language. Whereas the fact of being a {\textquoteleft}native user{\textquoteright} or a {\textquoteleft}non-native user{\textquoteright} can indeed be part of the speaker role and speaker identity, other equally important factors arising from the context of the exchange may play a role in speakers{\textquoteright} stance-taking choices.",
keywords = "Epistemic stance, L2 pragmatics, L2 spoken production, Speaker roles, Learner corpus",
author = "Dana Gablasova and Vaclav Brezina",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319179476",
volume = "3",
series = "Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "117--136",
editor = "Jes{\'u}s Romero-Trillo",
booktitle = "Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech?

T2 - evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus

AU - Gablasova, Dana

AU - Brezina, Vaclav

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study investigates stance-taking strategies in a context of an examination of spoken English. The focus of the research is on the interaction between the candidates (advanced L2 speakers) and the examiners (L1 speakers of English). In particular, the study explores the use of epistemic adverbial markers such as ‘maybe’, ‘certainly’ and ‘surely’. These markers are used not only to express speakers’ position (certainty or uncertainty) towards a statement, but also to express speakers’ position towards other interlocutors (e.g. to manage interpersonal relationships or to downplay strong assertions). The study is based on the advanced subsection of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus of spoken L2 production which currently contains approximately 0.45M words based on four speaking tasks: one mostly monologic task and three highly interactive tasks. The study compares the expression of epistemic stance by both the candidates and examiners and explains the differences between speakers’ performance in terms of different speaker roles assumed by the candidates and examiners in three dialogic tasks. The study stresses the importance of looking at the contextual factors of speakers’ pragmatic choices and demonstrates that when studying L2 spoken production it is important to go beyond characterising the speakers as ‘native’ or ‘non-native’ speakers of a language. Whereas the fact of being a ‘native user’ or a ‘non-native user’ can indeed be part of the speaker role and speaker identity, other equally important factors arising from the context of the exchange may play a role in speakers’ stance-taking choices.

AB - This study investigates stance-taking strategies in a context of an examination of spoken English. The focus of the research is on the interaction between the candidates (advanced L2 speakers) and the examiners (L1 speakers of English). In particular, the study explores the use of epistemic adverbial markers such as ‘maybe’, ‘certainly’ and ‘surely’. These markers are used not only to express speakers’ position (certainty or uncertainty) towards a statement, but also to express speakers’ position towards other interlocutors (e.g. to manage interpersonal relationships or to downplay strong assertions). The study is based on the advanced subsection of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus of spoken L2 production which currently contains approximately 0.45M words based on four speaking tasks: one mostly monologic task and three highly interactive tasks. The study compares the expression of epistemic stance by both the candidates and examiners and explains the differences between speakers’ performance in terms of different speaker roles assumed by the candidates and examiners in three dialogic tasks. The study stresses the importance of looking at the contextual factors of speakers’ pragmatic choices and demonstrates that when studying L2 spoken production it is important to go beyond characterising the speakers as ‘native’ or ‘non-native’ speakers of a language. Whereas the fact of being a ‘native user’ or a ‘non-native user’ can indeed be part of the speaker role and speaker identity, other equally important factors arising from the context of the exchange may play a role in speakers’ stance-taking choices.

KW - Epistemic stance

KW - L2 pragmatics

KW - L2 spoken production

KW - Speaker roles

KW - Learner corpus

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_6

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9783319179476

VL - 3

T3 - Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics

SP - 117

EP - 136

BT - Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015

A2 - Romero-Trillo, Jesús

PB - Springer

ER -