Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > During photosynthetic induction, biochemical an...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

During photosynthetic induction, biochemical and stomatal limitations differ between Brassica crops

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

During photosynthetic induction, biochemical and stomatal limitations differ between Brassica crops. / Taylor, Samuel; Orr, Douglas; Carmo-Silva, Elizabete et al.
In: Plant, Cell and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 11, 01.11.2020, p. 2623-2636.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Taylor S, Orr D, Carmo-Silva E, Long S. During photosynthetic induction, biochemical and stomatal limitations differ between Brassica crops. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2020 Nov 1;43(11):2623-2636. Epub 2020 Sept 10. doi: 10.1111/pce.13862

Author

Bibtex

@article{8150c0b9166b4c78b650519bce503109,
title = "During photosynthetic induction, biochemical and stomatal limitations differ between Brassica crops",
abstract = "Interventions to increase crop radiation use efficiency rely on understanding how biochemical and stomatal limitations affect photosynthesis. When leaves transition from shade to high light, slow increases in maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate and stomatal conductance limit net CO2 assimilation for several minutes. However, as stomata open, intercellular [CO2] increases, so electron transport rate could also become limiting. Photosynthetic limitations were evaluated in three important Brassica crops: B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus. Measurements of induction after a period of shade showed that net CO2 assimilation by B. rapa and B. napus saturated by 10 min. A new method of analyzing limitations to induction by varying intercellular [CO2] showed this was due to co-limitation by Rubisco and electron transport. By contrast, in B. oleracea, persistent Rubisco limitation meant that CO2 assimilation was still recovering 15 min after induction. Correspondingly, B. oleracea had the lowest Rubisco total activity. The methodology developed, and its application here, shows a means to identify the basis of variation in photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light, which could be exploited in breeding and bioengineering to improve crop productivity.",
author = "Samuel Taylor and Douglas Orr and Elizabete Carmo-Silva and Stephen Long",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pce.13862",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "2623--2636",
journal = "Plant, Cell and Environment",
issn = "0140-7791",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - During photosynthetic induction, biochemical and stomatal limitations differ between Brassica crops

AU - Taylor, Samuel

AU - Orr, Douglas

AU - Carmo-Silva, Elizabete

AU - Long, Stephen

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - Interventions to increase crop radiation use efficiency rely on understanding how biochemical and stomatal limitations affect photosynthesis. When leaves transition from shade to high light, slow increases in maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate and stomatal conductance limit net CO2 assimilation for several minutes. However, as stomata open, intercellular [CO2] increases, so electron transport rate could also become limiting. Photosynthetic limitations were evaluated in three important Brassica crops: B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus. Measurements of induction after a period of shade showed that net CO2 assimilation by B. rapa and B. napus saturated by 10 min. A new method of analyzing limitations to induction by varying intercellular [CO2] showed this was due to co-limitation by Rubisco and electron transport. By contrast, in B. oleracea, persistent Rubisco limitation meant that CO2 assimilation was still recovering 15 min after induction. Correspondingly, B. oleracea had the lowest Rubisco total activity. The methodology developed, and its application here, shows a means to identify the basis of variation in photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light, which could be exploited in breeding and bioengineering to improve crop productivity.

AB - Interventions to increase crop radiation use efficiency rely on understanding how biochemical and stomatal limitations affect photosynthesis. When leaves transition from shade to high light, slow increases in maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate and stomatal conductance limit net CO2 assimilation for several minutes. However, as stomata open, intercellular [CO2] increases, so electron transport rate could also become limiting. Photosynthetic limitations were evaluated in three important Brassica crops: B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus. Measurements of induction after a period of shade showed that net CO2 assimilation by B. rapa and B. napus saturated by 10 min. A new method of analyzing limitations to induction by varying intercellular [CO2] showed this was due to co-limitation by Rubisco and electron transport. By contrast, in B. oleracea, persistent Rubisco limitation meant that CO2 assimilation was still recovering 15 min after induction. Correspondingly, B. oleracea had the lowest Rubisco total activity. The methodology developed, and its application here, shows a means to identify the basis of variation in photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light, which could be exploited in breeding and bioengineering to improve crop productivity.

U2 - 10.1111/pce.13862

DO - 10.1111/pce.13862

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 2623

EP - 2636

JO - Plant, Cell and Environment

JF - Plant, Cell and Environment

SN - 0140-7791

IS - 11

ER -