Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Eating otherwise

Electronic data

  • 2016ChristouPhD.pdf

    Final published version, 2.31 MB, Word document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Eating otherwise: food and being in twentieth-century literature

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Unpublished

Standard

Eating otherwise : food and being in twentieth-century literature. / Christou, Maria.

Lancaster University, 2015. 272 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{2f438cedc56e409caea5f1c1ce973cb6,
title = "Eating otherwise: food and being in twentieth-century literature",
abstract = "Eating Otherwise: Food and Being in Twentieth-Century Literature thinks the {\textquoteleft}you are what you eat{\textquoteright} adage otherwise, exploring the entanglement of the ontological with the alimentary in twentieth-century literature. Since its inception more than thirty years ago, the booming field of literary food studies has shied away from engaging with the interrelation between the question of being (what one is) and the question of eating (what and how one eats). The assumption behind this seems to be that the {\textquoteleft}base{\textquoteright} question of eating, as something that is located in the {\textquoteleft}here and now{\textquoteright}, clashes or is incompatible with {\textquoteleft}lofty{\textquoteright} ontological preoccupations, which are traditionally associated with a conception of being as predetermined and immutable. Eating Otherwise challenges such assumptions, arguing that acts of {\textquoteleft}eating otherwise{\textquoteright} feature as means to ways of {\textquoteleft}being otherwise{\textquoteright} in the literature of the twentieth century, focusing primarily on the works of Georges Bataille, Samuel Beckett, Paul Auster, and Margaret Atwood. This selection of authors provides a distinction between the two halves of the twentieth century, the first generally associated with the modernist movement – where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as implementations of the injunction to {\textquoteleft}make it new{\textquoteright} – and the second generally associated with the postmodernist movement, where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as attempts to shake off the modernist influence, attempts which paradoxically take the form of incorporation. As well as uncovering the entanglement of the question of being with the question of eating in twentieth-century literature, then, and the possibility of ontological transformation that it points toward, the ontologico-alimentary investigations of this study also provide a perspective through which the relationship between the modern and the postmodern can be theorised.",
author = "Maria Christou",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - THES

T1 - Eating otherwise

T2 - food and being in twentieth-century literature

AU - Christou, Maria

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Eating Otherwise: Food and Being in Twentieth-Century Literature thinks the ‘you are what you eat’ adage otherwise, exploring the entanglement of the ontological with the alimentary in twentieth-century literature. Since its inception more than thirty years ago, the booming field of literary food studies has shied away from engaging with the interrelation between the question of being (what one is) and the question of eating (what and how one eats). The assumption behind this seems to be that the ‘base’ question of eating, as something that is located in the ‘here and now’, clashes or is incompatible with ‘lofty’ ontological preoccupations, which are traditionally associated with a conception of being as predetermined and immutable. Eating Otherwise challenges such assumptions, arguing that acts of ‘eating otherwise’ feature as means to ways of ‘being otherwise’ in the literature of the twentieth century, focusing primarily on the works of Georges Bataille, Samuel Beckett, Paul Auster, and Margaret Atwood. This selection of authors provides a distinction between the two halves of the twentieth century, the first generally associated with the modernist movement – where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as implementations of the injunction to ‘make it new’ – and the second generally associated with the postmodernist movement, where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as attempts to shake off the modernist influence, attempts which paradoxically take the form of incorporation. As well as uncovering the entanglement of the question of being with the question of eating in twentieth-century literature, then, and the possibility of ontological transformation that it points toward, the ontologico-alimentary investigations of this study also provide a perspective through which the relationship between the modern and the postmodern can be theorised.

AB - Eating Otherwise: Food and Being in Twentieth-Century Literature thinks the ‘you are what you eat’ adage otherwise, exploring the entanglement of the ontological with the alimentary in twentieth-century literature. Since its inception more than thirty years ago, the booming field of literary food studies has shied away from engaging with the interrelation between the question of being (what one is) and the question of eating (what and how one eats). The assumption behind this seems to be that the ‘base’ question of eating, as something that is located in the ‘here and now’, clashes or is incompatible with ‘lofty’ ontological preoccupations, which are traditionally associated with a conception of being as predetermined and immutable. Eating Otherwise challenges such assumptions, arguing that acts of ‘eating otherwise’ feature as means to ways of ‘being otherwise’ in the literature of the twentieth century, focusing primarily on the works of Georges Bataille, Samuel Beckett, Paul Auster, and Margaret Atwood. This selection of authors provides a distinction between the two halves of the twentieth century, the first generally associated with the modernist movement – where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as implementations of the injunction to ‘make it new’ – and the second generally associated with the postmodernist movement, where acts of eating otherwise can be seen as attempts to shake off the modernist influence, attempts which paradoxically take the form of incorporation. As well as uncovering the entanglement of the question of being with the question of eating in twentieth-century literature, then, and the possibility of ontological transformation that it points toward, the ontologico-alimentary investigations of this study also provide a perspective through which the relationship between the modern and the postmodern can be theorised.

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -