Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Economically optimal strategies for medium-term...
View graph of relations

Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident. / Yumashev, D.; Johnson, P.; Thomas, P.J.
In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 112, No. Part A, 11.2017, p. 63-76.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Yumashev, D, Johnson, P & Thomas, PJ 2017, 'Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident', Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 112, no. Part A, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022

APA

Yumashev, D., Johnson, P., & Thomas, P. J. (2017). Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 112(Part A), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022

Vancouver

Yumashev D, Johnson P, Thomas PJ. Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017 Nov;112(Part A):63-76. Epub 2017 Nov 20. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022

Author

Yumashev, D. ; Johnson, P. ; Thomas, P.J. / Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident. In: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017 ; Vol. 112, No. Part A. pp. 63-76.

Bibtex

@article{530859f5a5384546a2b173234f0cabe3,
title = "Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident",
abstract = "The dynamic process of ground contamination after a major nuclear accident is modelled, and the system is then extended to include the transient equations describing the three broad countermeasures: food bans, remediation and population movement (relocation and repopulation). Countermeasures are assumed to be applicable once the deposition period has ended and surface contamination measurements have stabilised. A value function is constructed to account for the major economic factors, including allowance for the detrimental effect on human health of radiation exposure. The principle of optimality is then applied by requiring the value function to satisfy the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman partial differential equation, yielding an economically optimal combination of the countermeasures at any given moment of time within the recovery period. A classification into Broad Strategies is made in order to explore the similarities in structure of optimal strategies for wide ranges of economic parameter values. Population relocation forms no part of any optimal strategy in the Base Case (or Case I) as parameters are varied over a wide range. Strategies incorporating relocation have a low probability of being optimal even in the low-probability sensitivity studies of Case II, where relocation is imposed immediately the accident happens, and Case III, where the Base Case assumption is reversed of lower economic productivity awaiting those moving from the original to the new area. It is concluded that relocation is almost certain to be a less than optimal response after a great many large-scale nuclear accidents.",
keywords = "Nuclear accident, Accident modelling, Optimal control, Principle of optimality, Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation, Economic optimality",
author = "D. Yumashev and P. Johnson and P.J. Thomas",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "63--76",
journal = "Process Safety and Environmental Protection",
issn = "0957-5820",
publisher = "Institution of Chemical Engineers",
number = "Part A",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economically optimal strategies for medium-term recovery after a major nuclear reactor accident

AU - Yumashev, D.

AU - Johnson, P.

AU - Thomas, P.J.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - The dynamic process of ground contamination after a major nuclear accident is modelled, and the system is then extended to include the transient equations describing the three broad countermeasures: food bans, remediation and population movement (relocation and repopulation). Countermeasures are assumed to be applicable once the deposition period has ended and surface contamination measurements have stabilised. A value function is constructed to account for the major economic factors, including allowance for the detrimental effect on human health of radiation exposure. The principle of optimality is then applied by requiring the value function to satisfy the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman partial differential equation, yielding an economically optimal combination of the countermeasures at any given moment of time within the recovery period. A classification into Broad Strategies is made in order to explore the similarities in structure of optimal strategies for wide ranges of economic parameter values. Population relocation forms no part of any optimal strategy in the Base Case (or Case I) as parameters are varied over a wide range. Strategies incorporating relocation have a low probability of being optimal even in the low-probability sensitivity studies of Case II, where relocation is imposed immediately the accident happens, and Case III, where the Base Case assumption is reversed of lower economic productivity awaiting those moving from the original to the new area. It is concluded that relocation is almost certain to be a less than optimal response after a great many large-scale nuclear accidents.

AB - The dynamic process of ground contamination after a major nuclear accident is modelled, and the system is then extended to include the transient equations describing the three broad countermeasures: food bans, remediation and population movement (relocation and repopulation). Countermeasures are assumed to be applicable once the deposition period has ended and surface contamination measurements have stabilised. A value function is constructed to account for the major economic factors, including allowance for the detrimental effect on human health of radiation exposure. The principle of optimality is then applied by requiring the value function to satisfy the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman partial differential equation, yielding an economically optimal combination of the countermeasures at any given moment of time within the recovery period. A classification into Broad Strategies is made in order to explore the similarities in structure of optimal strategies for wide ranges of economic parameter values. Population relocation forms no part of any optimal strategy in the Base Case (or Case I) as parameters are varied over a wide range. Strategies incorporating relocation have a low probability of being optimal even in the low-probability sensitivity studies of Case II, where relocation is imposed immediately the accident happens, and Case III, where the Base Case assumption is reversed of lower economic productivity awaiting those moving from the original to the new area. It is concluded that relocation is almost certain to be a less than optimal response after a great many large-scale nuclear accidents.

KW - Nuclear accident

KW - Accident modelling

KW - Optimal control

KW - Principle of optimality

KW - Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation

KW - Economic optimality

U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022

DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.022

M3 - Journal article

VL - 112

SP - 63

EP - 76

JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection

SN - 0957-5820

IS - Part A

ER -