Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibr...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK: a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK: a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial. / SoSTART Collaboration.
In: The Lancet Neurology, Vol. 20, No. 10, 31.10.2021, p. 842-853.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

SoSTART Collaboration. Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK: a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2021 Oct 31;20(10):842-853. Epub 2021 Sept 15. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00264-7

Author

Bibtex

@article{a1129ca637c14362bf1ce6534a76a14b,
title = "Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK: a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial",
abstract = "Background: Oral anticoagulation reduces the rate of systemic embolism for patients with atrial fibrillation by two-thirds, but its benefits for patients with previous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. In the Start or STop Anticoagulants Randomised Trial (SoSTART), we aimed to establish whether starting is non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation for survivors of intracranial haemorrhage who have atrial fibrillation. Methods: SoSTART was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, parallel-group, pilot phase trial done at 67 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) who had survived at least 24 h after symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, had atrial fibrillation, and had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2. Web-based computerised randomisation incorporating a minimisation algorithm allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid long-term (≥1 year) full treatment dose open-label oral anticoagulation. The participants assigned to start oral anticoagulation received either a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist, and the group assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation received standard clinical practice (antiplatelet agent or no antithrombotic agent). The primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, and was adjudicated by an individual masked to treatment allocation. All outcomes were ascertained for at least 1 year after randomisation and assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned participants, using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for minimisation covariates. We planned a sample size of 190 participants (one-sided p=0·025, power 90%, allowing for non-adherence) based on a non-inferiority margin of 12% (or adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 3·2). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03153150) and is complete. Findings: Between March 29, 2018, and Feb 27, 2020, consent was obtained at 61 sites for 218 participants, of whom 203 were randomly assigned at a median of 115 days (IQR 49–265) after intracranial haemorrhage onset. 101 were assigned to start and 102 to avoid oral anticoagulation. Participants were followed up for median of 1·2 years (IQR 0·97–1·95; completeness 97·2%). Starting oral anticoagulation was not non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation: eight (8%) of 101 in the start group versus four (4%) of 102 in the avoid group had intracranial haemorrhage recurrences (adjusted HR 2·42 [95% CI 0·72–8·09]; p=0·152). Serious adverse events occurred in 17 (17%) participants in the start group and 15 (15%) in the avoid group. 22 (22%) patients in the start group and 11 (11%) patients in the avoid group died during the study. Interpretation: Whether starting oral anticoagulation was non-inferior to avoiding it for people with atrial fibrillation after intracranial haemorrhage was inconclusive, although rates of recurrent intracranial haemorrhage were lower than expected. In view of weak evidence from analyses of three composite secondary outcomes, the possibility that oral anticoagulation might be superior for preventing symptomatic major vascular events should be investigated in adequately powered randomised trials. Funding: British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland.",
author = "{SoSTART Collaboration} and {Al-Shahi Salman}, Rustam and Catriona Keerie and Jacqueline Stephen and Steff Lewis and John Norrie and Dennis, {Martin S.} and Newby, {David E.} and Wardlaw, {Joanna M.} and Lip, {Gregory Y.H.} and Adrian Parry-Jones and White, {Philip M.} and Colin Baigent and Dan Lasserson and Colin Oliver and Fiach O'Mahony and Shannon Amoils and John Bamford and Jane Armitage and Jonathan Emberson and Rinkel, {Gabri{\"e}l J.R.} and Gordon Lowe and Karen Innes and Kasia Adamczuk and Lynn Dinsmore and Jonathan Drever and Garry Milne and Allan Walker and Aidan Hutchison and Carol Williams and Ruth Fraser and Rosemary Anderson and Kate Covil and Kelly Stewart and Jessica Rees and Peter Hall and Alistair Bullen and Andrew Stoddart and Moullaali, {Tom J.} and Jeb Palmer and Eleni Sakka and Joanne Perthen and Nicola Lyttle and Neshika Samarasekera and Allan MacRaild and Seona Burgess and Jessica Teasdale and Michelle Coakley and Pat Taylor and William Whiteley and Hedley Emsley",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00264-7",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "842--853",
journal = "The Lancet Neurology",
issn = "1474-4422",
publisher = "Lancet Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK

T2 - a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial

AU - SoSTART Collaboration

AU - Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam

AU - Keerie, Catriona

AU - Stephen, Jacqueline

AU - Lewis, Steff

AU - Norrie, John

AU - Dennis, Martin S.

AU - Newby, David E.

AU - Wardlaw, Joanna M.

AU - Lip, Gregory Y.H.

AU - Parry-Jones, Adrian

AU - White, Philip M.

AU - Baigent, Colin

AU - Lasserson, Dan

AU - Oliver, Colin

AU - O'Mahony, Fiach

AU - Amoils, Shannon

AU - Bamford, John

AU - Armitage, Jane

AU - Emberson, Jonathan

AU - Rinkel, Gabriël J.R.

AU - Lowe, Gordon

AU - Innes, Karen

AU - Adamczuk, Kasia

AU - Dinsmore, Lynn

AU - Drever, Jonathan

AU - Milne, Garry

AU - Walker, Allan

AU - Hutchison, Aidan

AU - Williams, Carol

AU - Fraser, Ruth

AU - Anderson, Rosemary

AU - Covil, Kate

AU - Stewart, Kelly

AU - Rees, Jessica

AU - Hall, Peter

AU - Bullen, Alistair

AU - Stoddart, Andrew

AU - Moullaali, Tom J.

AU - Palmer, Jeb

AU - Sakka, Eleni

AU - Perthen, Joanne

AU - Lyttle, Nicola

AU - Samarasekera, Neshika

AU - MacRaild, Allan

AU - Burgess, Seona

AU - Teasdale, Jessica

AU - Coakley, Michelle

AU - Taylor, Pat

AU - Whiteley, William

AU - Emsley, Hedley

PY - 2021/10/31

Y1 - 2021/10/31

N2 - Background: Oral anticoagulation reduces the rate of systemic embolism for patients with atrial fibrillation by two-thirds, but its benefits for patients with previous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. In the Start or STop Anticoagulants Randomised Trial (SoSTART), we aimed to establish whether starting is non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation for survivors of intracranial haemorrhage who have atrial fibrillation. Methods: SoSTART was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, parallel-group, pilot phase trial done at 67 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) who had survived at least 24 h after symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, had atrial fibrillation, and had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2. Web-based computerised randomisation incorporating a minimisation algorithm allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid long-term (≥1 year) full treatment dose open-label oral anticoagulation. The participants assigned to start oral anticoagulation received either a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist, and the group assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation received standard clinical practice (antiplatelet agent or no antithrombotic agent). The primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, and was adjudicated by an individual masked to treatment allocation. All outcomes were ascertained for at least 1 year after randomisation and assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned participants, using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for minimisation covariates. We planned a sample size of 190 participants (one-sided p=0·025, power 90%, allowing for non-adherence) based on a non-inferiority margin of 12% (or adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 3·2). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03153150) and is complete. Findings: Between March 29, 2018, and Feb 27, 2020, consent was obtained at 61 sites for 218 participants, of whom 203 were randomly assigned at a median of 115 days (IQR 49–265) after intracranial haemorrhage onset. 101 were assigned to start and 102 to avoid oral anticoagulation. Participants were followed up for median of 1·2 years (IQR 0·97–1·95; completeness 97·2%). Starting oral anticoagulation was not non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation: eight (8%) of 101 in the start group versus four (4%) of 102 in the avoid group had intracranial haemorrhage recurrences (adjusted HR 2·42 [95% CI 0·72–8·09]; p=0·152). Serious adverse events occurred in 17 (17%) participants in the start group and 15 (15%) in the avoid group. 22 (22%) patients in the start group and 11 (11%) patients in the avoid group died during the study. Interpretation: Whether starting oral anticoagulation was non-inferior to avoiding it for people with atrial fibrillation after intracranial haemorrhage was inconclusive, although rates of recurrent intracranial haemorrhage were lower than expected. In view of weak evidence from analyses of three composite secondary outcomes, the possibility that oral anticoagulation might be superior for preventing symptomatic major vascular events should be investigated in adequately powered randomised trials. Funding: British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland.

AB - Background: Oral anticoagulation reduces the rate of systemic embolism for patients with atrial fibrillation by two-thirds, but its benefits for patients with previous intracranial haemorrhage are uncertain. In the Start or STop Anticoagulants Randomised Trial (SoSTART), we aimed to establish whether starting is non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation for survivors of intracranial haemorrhage who have atrial fibrillation. Methods: SoSTART was a prospective, randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, parallel-group, pilot phase trial done at 67 hospitals in the UK. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) who had survived at least 24 h after symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, had atrial fibrillation, and had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2. Web-based computerised randomisation incorporating a minimisation algorithm allocated participants (1:1) to start or avoid long-term (≥1 year) full treatment dose open-label oral anticoagulation. The participants assigned to start oral anticoagulation received either a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist, and the group assigned to avoid oral anticoagulation received standard clinical practice (antiplatelet agent or no antithrombotic agent). The primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, and was adjudicated by an individual masked to treatment allocation. All outcomes were ascertained for at least 1 year after randomisation and assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned participants, using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for minimisation covariates. We planned a sample size of 190 participants (one-sided p=0·025, power 90%, allowing for non-adherence) based on a non-inferiority margin of 12% (or adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 3·2). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03153150) and is complete. Findings: Between March 29, 2018, and Feb 27, 2020, consent was obtained at 61 sites for 218 participants, of whom 203 were randomly assigned at a median of 115 days (IQR 49–265) after intracranial haemorrhage onset. 101 were assigned to start and 102 to avoid oral anticoagulation. Participants were followed up for median of 1·2 years (IQR 0·97–1·95; completeness 97·2%). Starting oral anticoagulation was not non-inferior to avoiding oral anticoagulation: eight (8%) of 101 in the start group versus four (4%) of 102 in the avoid group had intracranial haemorrhage recurrences (adjusted HR 2·42 [95% CI 0·72–8·09]; p=0·152). Serious adverse events occurred in 17 (17%) participants in the start group and 15 (15%) in the avoid group. 22 (22%) patients in the start group and 11 (11%) patients in the avoid group died during the study. Interpretation: Whether starting oral anticoagulation was non-inferior to avoiding it for people with atrial fibrillation after intracranial haemorrhage was inconclusive, although rates of recurrent intracranial haemorrhage were lower than expected. In view of weak evidence from analyses of three composite secondary outcomes, the possibility that oral anticoagulation might be superior for preventing symptomatic major vascular events should be investigated in adequately powered randomised trials. Funding: British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland.

U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00264-7

DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00264-7

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34487722

AN - SCOPUS:85114800883

VL - 20

SP - 842

EP - 853

JO - The Lancet Neurology

JF - The Lancet Neurology

SN - 1474-4422

IS - 10

ER -