Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Effortful listening

Electronic data

  • HEARES-D-21-00004R1_Re-RevisedManuscript_v4_HearResAccepted

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Hearing Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Hearing Research, 410, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348

    Accepted author manuscript, 679 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Effortful listening: Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Effortful listening: Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not. / Slade, K.; Kramer, S.E.; Fairclough, S. et al.
In: Hearing Research, Vol. 410, 108348, 31.10.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Slade K, Kramer SE, Fairclough S, Richter M. Effortful listening: Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not. Hearing Research. 2021 Oct 31;410:108348. Epub 2021 Sept 4. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348

Author

Bibtex

@article{73d1931732b041189aad89dd57fa3f69,
title = "Effortful listening: Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not",
abstract = "Research on listening effort has used various physiological measures to examine the biological correlates of listening effort but a systematic examination of the impact of listening demand on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity is still lacking. The presented study aimed to close this gap by assessing cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to variations in listening demand. For this purpose, 45 participants performed four speech-in-noise tasks differing in listening demand—manipulated as signal-to-noise ratio varying between +23 dB and -16 dB—while their pre-ejection period and respiratory sinus arrythmia responses were assessed. Cardiac responses showed the expected effect of listening demand on sympathetic activity, but failed to provide evidence for the expected listening demand impact on parasympathetic activity: Pre-ejection period reactivity increased with increasing listening demand across the three possible listening conditions and was low in the very high (impossible) demand condition, whereas respiratory sinus arrythmia did not show this pattern. These findings have two main implications. First, cardiac sympathetic responses seem to be the more sensitive correlate of the impact of task demand on listening effort compared to cardiac parasympathetic responses. Second, very high listening demand may lead to disengagement and correspondingly low effort and reduced cardiac sympathetic response.",
keywords = "Effort, Sympathetic activity, Parasympathetic activity, Pre-ejection period, Respiratory sinus arrythmia, Motivational intensity theory",
author = "K. Slade and S.E. Kramer and S. Fairclough and M. Richter",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Hearing Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Hearing Research, 410, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348 ",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348",
language = "English",
volume = "410",
journal = "Hearing Research",
issn = "0378-5955",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effortful listening

T2 - Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not

AU - Slade, K.

AU - Kramer, S.E.

AU - Fairclough, S.

AU - Richter, M.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Hearing Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Hearing Research, 410, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348

PY - 2021/10/31

Y1 - 2021/10/31

N2 - Research on listening effort has used various physiological measures to examine the biological correlates of listening effort but a systematic examination of the impact of listening demand on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity is still lacking. The presented study aimed to close this gap by assessing cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to variations in listening demand. For this purpose, 45 participants performed four speech-in-noise tasks differing in listening demand—manipulated as signal-to-noise ratio varying between +23 dB and -16 dB—while their pre-ejection period and respiratory sinus arrythmia responses were assessed. Cardiac responses showed the expected effect of listening demand on sympathetic activity, but failed to provide evidence for the expected listening demand impact on parasympathetic activity: Pre-ejection period reactivity increased with increasing listening demand across the three possible listening conditions and was low in the very high (impossible) demand condition, whereas respiratory sinus arrythmia did not show this pattern. These findings have two main implications. First, cardiac sympathetic responses seem to be the more sensitive correlate of the impact of task demand on listening effort compared to cardiac parasympathetic responses. Second, very high listening demand may lead to disengagement and correspondingly low effort and reduced cardiac sympathetic response.

AB - Research on listening effort has used various physiological measures to examine the biological correlates of listening effort but a systematic examination of the impact of listening demand on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity is still lacking. The presented study aimed to close this gap by assessing cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to variations in listening demand. For this purpose, 45 participants performed four speech-in-noise tasks differing in listening demand—manipulated as signal-to-noise ratio varying between +23 dB and -16 dB—while their pre-ejection period and respiratory sinus arrythmia responses were assessed. Cardiac responses showed the expected effect of listening demand on sympathetic activity, but failed to provide evidence for the expected listening demand impact on parasympathetic activity: Pre-ejection period reactivity increased with increasing listening demand across the three possible listening conditions and was low in the very high (impossible) demand condition, whereas respiratory sinus arrythmia did not show this pattern. These findings have two main implications. First, cardiac sympathetic responses seem to be the more sensitive correlate of the impact of task demand on listening effort compared to cardiac parasympathetic responses. Second, very high listening demand may lead to disengagement and correspondingly low effort and reduced cardiac sympathetic response.

KW - Effort

KW - Sympathetic activity

KW - Parasympathetic activity

KW - Pre-ejection period

KW - Respiratory sinus arrythmia

KW - Motivational intensity theory

U2 - 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348

DO - 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348

M3 - Journal article

VL - 410

JO - Hearing Research

JF - Hearing Research

SN - 0378-5955

M1 - 108348

ER -