Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagia...

Electronic data

  • 10.32601-ejal.464115-542635

    Final published version, 995 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing. / Rets, Irina; Ilya, Ali.
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 26.09.2018, p. 193-211.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Rets, I & Ilya, A 2018, 'Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing', Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193-211. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.464115

APA

Rets, I., & Ilya, A. (2018). Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.464115

Vancouver

Rets I, Ilya A. Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2018 Sept 26;4(2):193-211. doi: 10.32601/ejal.464115

Author

Rets, Irina ; Ilya, Ali. / Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing. In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2018 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 193-211.

Bibtex

@article{804a749f572f4752b365a42e1966072e,
title = "Eliciting ELT students{\textquoteright} Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing",
abstract = "Given that the term {\textquoteleft}plagiarism{\textquoteright} is open to multiple interpretations, resulting in confusion among students and teachers alike, research that investigates the current state of empirical evidence and sheds light on students{\textquoteright} ability to define and detect this notion has important pedagogical implications. This study examines undergraduate English Language Teaching (ELT) students{\textquoteright} understanding of plagiarism in academic writing through qualitative data collection methods. After the focus group filled in the open-ended questionnaire, they were exposed to two sets of texts each containing an original, a plagiarized and non-plagiarized copy. The copy in the first set featured mainly word-for-word plagiarism while the copy in the second set was plagiarized in terms of illicit paraphrasing. The students were asked to identify whether there is any plagiarism in each copy and assess the texts regarding their acceptability in the format of an interview and think-aloud protocols. The results of the open-ended questionnaire and interviews were compared revealing that although all the students were able to define plagiarism correctly, most of them failed to identify it in the written text. The study also uncovered discrepancies in how the students view the aforementioned types of plagiarism.",
keywords = "Paraphrasing and unacknowledged copying, plagiarism, scientific writing, think-aloud protocols, undergraduate research experience",
author = "Irina Rets and Ali Ilya",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
day = "26",
doi = "10.32601/ejal.464115",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "193--211",
journal = "Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eliciting ELT students’ Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing

AU - Rets, Irina

AU - Ilya, Ali

PY - 2018/9/26

Y1 - 2018/9/26

N2 - Given that the term ‘plagiarism’ is open to multiple interpretations, resulting in confusion among students and teachers alike, research that investigates the current state of empirical evidence and sheds light on students’ ability to define and detect this notion has important pedagogical implications. This study examines undergraduate English Language Teaching (ELT) students’ understanding of plagiarism in academic writing through qualitative data collection methods. After the focus group filled in the open-ended questionnaire, they were exposed to two sets of texts each containing an original, a plagiarized and non-plagiarized copy. The copy in the first set featured mainly word-for-word plagiarism while the copy in the second set was plagiarized in terms of illicit paraphrasing. The students were asked to identify whether there is any plagiarism in each copy and assess the texts regarding their acceptability in the format of an interview and think-aloud protocols. The results of the open-ended questionnaire and interviews were compared revealing that although all the students were able to define plagiarism correctly, most of them failed to identify it in the written text. The study also uncovered discrepancies in how the students view the aforementioned types of plagiarism.

AB - Given that the term ‘plagiarism’ is open to multiple interpretations, resulting in confusion among students and teachers alike, research that investigates the current state of empirical evidence and sheds light on students’ ability to define and detect this notion has important pedagogical implications. This study examines undergraduate English Language Teaching (ELT) students’ understanding of plagiarism in academic writing through qualitative data collection methods. After the focus group filled in the open-ended questionnaire, they were exposed to two sets of texts each containing an original, a plagiarized and non-plagiarized copy. The copy in the first set featured mainly word-for-word plagiarism while the copy in the second set was plagiarized in terms of illicit paraphrasing. The students were asked to identify whether there is any plagiarism in each copy and assess the texts regarding their acceptability in the format of an interview and think-aloud protocols. The results of the open-ended questionnaire and interviews were compared revealing that although all the students were able to define plagiarism correctly, most of them failed to identify it in the written text. The study also uncovered discrepancies in how the students view the aforementioned types of plagiarism.

KW - Paraphrasing and unacknowledged copying

KW - plagiarism

KW - scientific writing

KW - think-aloud protocols

KW - undergraduate research experience

U2 - 10.32601/ejal.464115

DO - 10.32601/ejal.464115

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 193

EP - 211

JO - Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics

JF - Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics

IS - 2

ER -