Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Embracing the concept of reproducible research

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Embracing the concept of reproducible research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review

Published

Standard

Embracing the concept of reproducible research. / Diggle, Peter J; Zeger, Scott L.
In: Biostatistics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 07.2010, p. 375-375.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review

Harvard

Diggle, PJ & Zeger, SL 2010, 'Embracing the concept of reproducible research', Biostatistics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 375-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029

APA

Diggle, P. J., & Zeger, S. L. (2010). Embracing the concept of reproducible research. Biostatistics, 11(3), 375-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029

Vancouver

Diggle PJ, Zeger SL. Embracing the concept of reproducible research. Biostatistics. 2010 Jul;11(3):375-375. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029

Author

Diggle, Peter J ; Zeger, Scott L. / Embracing the concept of reproducible research. In: Biostatistics. 2010 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 375-375.

Bibtex

@article{b0b34313e9ff4022bb227d009d836b7b,
title = "Embracing the concept of reproducible research",
abstract = "In the July 2009 issue of Biostatistics, we announced arrangements intended to encourage authors of papers in the journal to embrace the concept of what has come to be known as Reproducible Research. In that issue, Roger Peng, one of our Associate Editors, outlined these arrangements, which were deliberately set out as an opportunity, rather than an obligation, to make data and/or code available whereby interested readers could, if they wished, reproduce or “modify” any published analysis (Peng, 2009). The emphasis is important. Our aim was not to police the technical correctness of published work but rather to recognize that a nontrivial …",
keywords = "Publications, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics as Topic",
author = "Diggle, {Peter J} and Zeger, {Scott L}",
year = "2010",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "375--375",
journal = "Biostatistics",
issn = "1468-4357",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embracing the concept of reproducible research

AU - Diggle, Peter J

AU - Zeger, Scott L

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - In the July 2009 issue of Biostatistics, we announced arrangements intended to encourage authors of papers in the journal to embrace the concept of what has come to be known as Reproducible Research. In that issue, Roger Peng, one of our Associate Editors, outlined these arrangements, which were deliberately set out as an opportunity, rather than an obligation, to make data and/or code available whereby interested readers could, if they wished, reproduce or “modify” any published analysis (Peng, 2009). The emphasis is important. Our aim was not to police the technical correctness of published work but rather to recognize that a nontrivial …

AB - In the July 2009 issue of Biostatistics, we announced arrangements intended to encourage authors of papers in the journal to embrace the concept of what has come to be known as Reproducible Research. In that issue, Roger Peng, one of our Associate Editors, outlined these arrangements, which were deliberately set out as an opportunity, rather than an obligation, to make data and/or code available whereby interested readers could, if they wished, reproduce or “modify” any published analysis (Peng, 2009). The emphasis is important. Our aim was not to police the technical correctness of published work but rather to recognize that a nontrivial …

KW - Publications

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Statistics as Topic

U2 - 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029

DO - 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq029

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 20538869

VL - 11

SP - 375

EP - 375

JO - Biostatistics

JF - Biostatistics

SN - 1468-4357

IS - 3

ER -