Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Employee incentives and family firm innovation

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach. / Villani, E.; Linder, C; De Massis, Alfredo et al.
In: Journal of Management, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.05.2024, p. 1797 - 1835.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Villani, E, Linder, C, De Massis, A & Eddleston, KA 2024, 'Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach', Journal of Management, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1797 - 1835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206323115732

APA

Villani, E., Linder, C., De Massis, A., & Eddleston, K. A. (2024). Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach. Journal of Management, 50(5), 1797 - 1835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206323115732

Vancouver

Villani E, Linder C, De Massis A, Eddleston KA. Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach. Journal of Management. 2024 May 1;50(5):1797 - 1835. Epub 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.1177/0149206323115732

Author

Villani, E. ; Linder, C ; De Massis, Alfredo et al. / Employee incentives and family firm innovation : A configurational approach. In: Journal of Management. 2024 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 1797 - 1835.

Bibtex

@article{0d58ff0a00df43f1a3a3370415f7db9d,
title = "Employee incentives and family firm innovation: A configurational approach",
abstract = "According to family business theory and practice, family firms often face a paradoxical tension between their anchorage to the past and the need to renew and innovate to remain competitive, which often hampers innovation. Given that innovation is inherently a social process that depends on the knowledge and creativity of an organization{\textquoteright}s people, employee incentives may be key to managing the tradition–innovation paradox and unlocking a family firm's innovation potential. However, current research has not addressed how family firms can effectively configure incentives to promote innovation. Drawing on a configurational approach and the unique properties of the qualitative comparative analysis method, our study reveals that the set of incentives that family firms use to motivate their employees toward innovation differs in relation to whether they are more or less attached to tradition. As such, in line with the principle of equifinality, family firms with high attachment to tradition can be as innovative as those with low attachment to tradition by implementing the right configuration of incentives. Thus, we offer a human resource management perspective on innovation that advances knowledge on how family firms can unlock their innovation potential.",
author = "E. Villani and C Linder and {De Massis}, Alfredo and Eddleston, {Kimberly A.}",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206323115732",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1797 -- 1835",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employee incentives and family firm innovation

T2 - A configurational approach

AU - Villani, E.

AU - Linder, C

AU - De Massis, Alfredo

AU - Eddleston, Kimberly A.

PY - 2024/5/1

Y1 - 2024/5/1

N2 - According to family business theory and practice, family firms often face a paradoxical tension between their anchorage to the past and the need to renew and innovate to remain competitive, which often hampers innovation. Given that innovation is inherently a social process that depends on the knowledge and creativity of an organization’s people, employee incentives may be key to managing the tradition–innovation paradox and unlocking a family firm's innovation potential. However, current research has not addressed how family firms can effectively configure incentives to promote innovation. Drawing on a configurational approach and the unique properties of the qualitative comparative analysis method, our study reveals that the set of incentives that family firms use to motivate their employees toward innovation differs in relation to whether they are more or less attached to tradition. As such, in line with the principle of equifinality, family firms with high attachment to tradition can be as innovative as those with low attachment to tradition by implementing the right configuration of incentives. Thus, we offer a human resource management perspective on innovation that advances knowledge on how family firms can unlock their innovation potential.

AB - According to family business theory and practice, family firms often face a paradoxical tension between their anchorage to the past and the need to renew and innovate to remain competitive, which often hampers innovation. Given that innovation is inherently a social process that depends on the knowledge and creativity of an organization’s people, employee incentives may be key to managing the tradition–innovation paradox and unlocking a family firm's innovation potential. However, current research has not addressed how family firms can effectively configure incentives to promote innovation. Drawing on a configurational approach and the unique properties of the qualitative comparative analysis method, our study reveals that the set of incentives that family firms use to motivate their employees toward innovation differs in relation to whether they are more or less attached to tradition. As such, in line with the principle of equifinality, family firms with high attachment to tradition can be as innovative as those with low attachment to tradition by implementing the right configuration of incentives. Thus, we offer a human resource management perspective on innovation that advances knowledge on how family firms can unlock their innovation potential.

U2 - 10.1177/0149206323115732

DO - 10.1177/0149206323115732

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 1797

EP - 1835

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 5

ER -