Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Environmental agreements under asymmetric infor...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Environmental agreements under asymmetric information

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Environmental agreements under asymmetric information. / Slechten, Aurélie.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Slechten, A 2015 'Environmental agreements under asymmetric information' Economics Working Paper Series, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Slechten, A. (2015). Environmental agreements under asymmetric information. (Economics Working Paper Series). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Slechten A. Environmental agreements under asymmetric information. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2015 Oct. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Slechten, Aurélie. / Environmental agreements under asymmetric information. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{6b3cf61e4f894bd9b7bd775502309dff,
title = "Environmental agreements under asymmetric information",
abstract = "In a two-country model, I analyze international environmental agreementswhen a country's emission abatement costs are private information and participation to an agreement is voluntary. I show that the presence of asymmetric information may prevent countries from reaching a first-best agreement if this information asymmetry is too high. I propose a new channel to restore the feasibility of the first-best agreement: pre-play communication. By revealing its abatement cost through a certification agency in a pre-play communication stage, a country commits not to misreport this abatement cost during the negotiations of an agreement. Hence, following certification by at least one country, information asymmetry is reduced. Certification restores the feasibility of the first-best agreement except for intermediate levels of information asymmetry. For those levels, one country undergoing certification is not always sufficient to restore the feasibility of the first-best but it is impossible to find transfers between countries such that they both optimally accept to undergo certification. One country has always an incentive to free-ride on the other country's certification.",
keywords = "environmental agreements, Asymmetric information, certification , information disclosure",
author = "Aur{\'e}lie Slechten",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Environmental agreements under asymmetric information

AU - Slechten, Aurélie

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - In a two-country model, I analyze international environmental agreementswhen a country's emission abatement costs are private information and participation to an agreement is voluntary. I show that the presence of asymmetric information may prevent countries from reaching a first-best agreement if this information asymmetry is too high. I propose a new channel to restore the feasibility of the first-best agreement: pre-play communication. By revealing its abatement cost through a certification agency in a pre-play communication stage, a country commits not to misreport this abatement cost during the negotiations of an agreement. Hence, following certification by at least one country, information asymmetry is reduced. Certification restores the feasibility of the first-best agreement except for intermediate levels of information asymmetry. For those levels, one country undergoing certification is not always sufficient to restore the feasibility of the first-best but it is impossible to find transfers between countries such that they both optimally accept to undergo certification. One country has always an incentive to free-ride on the other country's certification.

AB - In a two-country model, I analyze international environmental agreementswhen a country's emission abatement costs are private information and participation to an agreement is voluntary. I show that the presence of asymmetric information may prevent countries from reaching a first-best agreement if this information asymmetry is too high. I propose a new channel to restore the feasibility of the first-best agreement: pre-play communication. By revealing its abatement cost through a certification agency in a pre-play communication stage, a country commits not to misreport this abatement cost during the negotiations of an agreement. Hence, following certification by at least one country, information asymmetry is reduced. Certification restores the feasibility of the first-best agreement except for intermediate levels of information asymmetry. For those levels, one country undergoing certification is not always sufficient to restore the feasibility of the first-best but it is impossible to find transfers between countries such that they both optimally accept to undergo certification. One country has always an incentive to free-ride on the other country's certification.

KW - environmental agreements

KW - Asymmetric information

KW - certification

KW - information disclosure

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Environmental agreements under asymmetric information

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -