Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in ...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry. / Fellowes, Matthew.
In: Philosophical Psychology, 10.03.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fellowes M. Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry. Philosophical Psychology. 2024 Mar 10. Epub 2024 Mar 10. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823

Author

Bibtex

@article{8655d88e7e4f4b73b2823b081668e0ad,
title = "Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry",
abstract = "Self-diagnosis in psychiatry is where individuals diagnose themselves rather than rely upon official diagnosticians to supply a psychiatric diagnosis. The accuracy of self-diagnosis is a contested topic. In this paper, I outline what arguments are needed to see self-diagnosis as accurate and how different approaches to self-diagnosis require different arguments. I show how different arguments are required to justify accuracy for an autistic individual judging they are autistic compared to non-autistic individuals judging they are not autistic. Different arguments are required if a self-diagnosing individual accepts or rejects official diagnostic criteria. Finally, different arguments are required depending upon whether diagnoses are seen as objective entities, the product of theoretical virtues or practically useful groupings. All these approaches require unique arguments to justify the accuracy of self-diagnosis. Identifying the required arguments for different approaches is a stepping stone toward establishing whether those arguments and which of those arguments can be successfully justified.",
author = "Matthew Fellowes",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823",
language = "English",
journal = "Philosophical Psychology",
issn = "0951-5089",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry

AU - Fellowes, Matthew

PY - 2024/3/10

Y1 - 2024/3/10

N2 - Self-diagnosis in psychiatry is where individuals diagnose themselves rather than rely upon official diagnosticians to supply a psychiatric diagnosis. The accuracy of self-diagnosis is a contested topic. In this paper, I outline what arguments are needed to see self-diagnosis as accurate and how different approaches to self-diagnosis require different arguments. I show how different arguments are required to justify accuracy for an autistic individual judging they are autistic compared to non-autistic individuals judging they are not autistic. Different arguments are required if a self-diagnosing individual accepts or rejects official diagnostic criteria. Finally, different arguments are required depending upon whether diagnoses are seen as objective entities, the product of theoretical virtues or practically useful groupings. All these approaches require unique arguments to justify the accuracy of self-diagnosis. Identifying the required arguments for different approaches is a stepping stone toward establishing whether those arguments and which of those arguments can be successfully justified.

AB - Self-diagnosis in psychiatry is where individuals diagnose themselves rather than rely upon official diagnosticians to supply a psychiatric diagnosis. The accuracy of self-diagnosis is a contested topic. In this paper, I outline what arguments are needed to see self-diagnosis as accurate and how different approaches to self-diagnosis require different arguments. I show how different arguments are required to justify accuracy for an autistic individual judging they are autistic compared to non-autistic individuals judging they are not autistic. Different arguments are required if a self-diagnosing individual accepts or rejects official diagnostic criteria. Finally, different arguments are required depending upon whether diagnoses are seen as objective entities, the product of theoretical virtues or practically useful groupings. All these approaches require unique arguments to justify the accuracy of self-diagnosis. Identifying the required arguments for different approaches is a stepping stone toward establishing whether those arguments and which of those arguments can be successfully justified.

U2 - 10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823

DO - 10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823

M3 - Journal article

JO - Philosophical Psychology

JF - Philosophical Psychology

SN - 0951-5089

ER -