Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Estimating population mental health effects of ...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_Revised_Public_Health

    Accepted author manuscript, 344 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019. / Marimpi, Maria; Barr, Ben; Baxter, Andrew J. et al.
In: Public Health, 09.06.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Marimpi, M, Barr, B, Baxter, AJ, Hugh-Jones, S, Taylor-Robinson, D, Vittal Katikireddi, S, Brown, H, Cheetham, M, Morris, S, Richiardi, M, Sutton, M, Bambra, C, Craig, P & Wickham, S 2025, 'Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019', Public Health.

APA

Marimpi, M., Barr, B., Baxter, A. J., Hugh-Jones, S., Taylor-Robinson, D., Vittal Katikireddi, S., Brown, H., Cheetham, M., Morris, S., Richiardi, M., Sutton, M., Bambra, C., Craig, P., & Wickham, S. (in press). Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019. Public Health.

Vancouver

Marimpi M, Barr B, Baxter AJ, Hugh-Jones S, Taylor-Robinson D, Vittal Katikireddi S et al. Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019. Public Health. 2025 Jun 9.

Author

Bibtex

@article{15534ea19e62418d9cbaaaed56a22c99,
title = "Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019",
abstract = "ObjectivesUniversal Credit (UC) was introduced in the UK in April 2013 in selected areas, marking the beginning of its phased rollout. Previous research identifies acute health harms among unemployed people, but the policy{\textquoteright}s impacts longer-term and on broader claimant groups remain unknown. This study explored UC effects on population mental health for up to four years post-introduction on a larger cohort of claimants, including employed people. Study designLongitudinal study.MethodsWe used data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study between 2009-2019 linking 108,247 observations (29,528 working age participants) to administrative UC Local Authority district data. We compared a UC-eligible population – reporting receipt of either UC or any of six legacy benefits (treatment group) – to individuals receiving alternative benefits (comparison group). We used standard and novel difference-in-differences approaches, exploiting geographical variation of UC rollout, and accounting for heterogeneity in treatment timing, to estimate mental health impacts (SF-12 Mental Component Summary) on average and at different time points post-introduction. ResultsUC was associated with mental health declining by 0·70 units (95% CI -1·24 to -0·15), a 1·5% relative reduction. Effects were larger during the first year of exposure (-1·01, 95% CI -1·93 to -0·10) without returning to baseline levels. Between 2013 and 2019, an estimated 111,954 (95% CI 35,497 to 182,948) additional people experienced depression and/or anxiety after UC{\textquoteright}s introduction, 27,115 of whom may have reached diagnostic threshold for common mental disorders. ConclusionsUC led to a sustained deterioration in population mental health, particularly marked in the first year of implementation. Reforms to UC are warranted to mitigate adverse mental health impacts. Keywords: Population mental health; health inequalities; Universal Credit; social welfare reform; difference-in-differences ",
author = "Maria Marimpi and Ben Barr and Baxter, {Andrew J.} and Samuel Hugh-Jones and David Taylor-Robinson and {Vittal Katikireddi}, Srinivasa and Heather Brown and Mandy Cheetham and Stephanie Morris and Matteo Richiardi and Matt Sutton and Clare Bambra and Peter Craig and Sophie Wickham",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
day = "9",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating population mental health effects of the rollout of Universal Credit in the UK using standard and novel Difference-in-Differences analysis, 2009 - 2019

AU - Marimpi, Maria

AU - Barr, Ben

AU - Baxter, Andrew J.

AU - Hugh-Jones, Samuel

AU - Taylor-Robinson, David

AU - Vittal Katikireddi, Srinivasa

AU - Brown, Heather

AU - Cheetham, Mandy

AU - Morris, Stephanie

AU - Richiardi, Matteo

AU - Sutton, Matt

AU - Bambra, Clare

AU - Craig, Peter

AU - Wickham, Sophie

PY - 2025/6/9

Y1 - 2025/6/9

N2 - ObjectivesUniversal Credit (UC) was introduced in the UK in April 2013 in selected areas, marking the beginning of its phased rollout. Previous research identifies acute health harms among unemployed people, but the policy’s impacts longer-term and on broader claimant groups remain unknown. This study explored UC effects on population mental health for up to four years post-introduction on a larger cohort of claimants, including employed people. Study designLongitudinal study.MethodsWe used data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study between 2009-2019 linking 108,247 observations (29,528 working age participants) to administrative UC Local Authority district data. We compared a UC-eligible population – reporting receipt of either UC or any of six legacy benefits (treatment group) – to individuals receiving alternative benefits (comparison group). We used standard and novel difference-in-differences approaches, exploiting geographical variation of UC rollout, and accounting for heterogeneity in treatment timing, to estimate mental health impacts (SF-12 Mental Component Summary) on average and at different time points post-introduction. ResultsUC was associated with mental health declining by 0·70 units (95% CI -1·24 to -0·15), a 1·5% relative reduction. Effects were larger during the first year of exposure (-1·01, 95% CI -1·93 to -0·10) without returning to baseline levels. Between 2013 and 2019, an estimated 111,954 (95% CI 35,497 to 182,948) additional people experienced depression and/or anxiety after UC’s introduction, 27,115 of whom may have reached diagnostic threshold for common mental disorders. ConclusionsUC led to a sustained deterioration in population mental health, particularly marked in the first year of implementation. Reforms to UC are warranted to mitigate adverse mental health impacts. Keywords: Population mental health; health inequalities; Universal Credit; social welfare reform; difference-in-differences

AB - ObjectivesUniversal Credit (UC) was introduced in the UK in April 2013 in selected areas, marking the beginning of its phased rollout. Previous research identifies acute health harms among unemployed people, but the policy’s impacts longer-term and on broader claimant groups remain unknown. This study explored UC effects on population mental health for up to four years post-introduction on a larger cohort of claimants, including employed people. Study designLongitudinal study.MethodsWe used data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study between 2009-2019 linking 108,247 observations (29,528 working age participants) to administrative UC Local Authority district data. We compared a UC-eligible population – reporting receipt of either UC or any of six legacy benefits (treatment group) – to individuals receiving alternative benefits (comparison group). We used standard and novel difference-in-differences approaches, exploiting geographical variation of UC rollout, and accounting for heterogeneity in treatment timing, to estimate mental health impacts (SF-12 Mental Component Summary) on average and at different time points post-introduction. ResultsUC was associated with mental health declining by 0·70 units (95% CI -1·24 to -0·15), a 1·5% relative reduction. Effects were larger during the first year of exposure (-1·01, 95% CI -1·93 to -0·10) without returning to baseline levels. Between 2013 and 2019, an estimated 111,954 (95% CI 35,497 to 182,948) additional people experienced depression and/or anxiety after UC’s introduction, 27,115 of whom may have reached diagnostic threshold for common mental disorders. ConclusionsUC led to a sustained deterioration in population mental health, particularly marked in the first year of implementation. Reforms to UC are warranted to mitigate adverse mental health impacts. Keywords: Population mental health; health inequalities; Universal Credit; social welfare reform; difference-in-differences

M3 - Journal article

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

ER -