Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Euclid preparation

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Euclid preparation: XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge: Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Euclid preparation: XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge: Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies. / Euclid Collaboration.
In: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 671, A101, 31.03.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Euclid Collaboration. Euclid preparation: XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge: Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2023 Mar 31;671:A101. Epub 2023 Mar 14. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245041

Author

Bibtex

@article{af33b5273e764a848fd97ce00b2a4114,
title = "Euclid preparation: XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge: Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies",
abstract = "The European Space Agency's Euclid mission will provide high-quality imaging for about 1.5 billion galaxies. A software pipeline to automatically process and analyse such a huge amount of data in real time is being developed by the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium; this pipeline will include a model-fitting algorithm, which will provide photometric and morphological estimates of paramount importance for the core science goals of the mission and for legacy science. The Euclid Morphology Challenge is a comparative investigation of the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data, aimed at providing the baseline to identify the best-suited algorithm to be implemented in the pipeline. In this paper we describe the simulated dataset, and we discuss the photometry results. A companion paper is focussed on the structural and morphological estimates. We created mock Euclid images simulating five fields of view of 0.48 deg2 each in the IE band of the VIS instrument, containing a total of about one and a half million galaxies (of which 350 000 have a nominal signal-to-noise ratio above 5), each with three realisations of galaxy profiles (single and double S{\'e}rsic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network); for one of the fields in the double S{\'e}rsic realisation, we also simulated images for the three near-infrared YE, JE, and HE bands of the NISP-P instrument, and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands (u, g, r, i, and z), which together form a typical dataset for an Euclid observation. The images were simulated at the expected Euclid Wide Survey depths. To analyse the results, we created diagnostic plots and defined metrics to take into account the completeness of the provided catalogues, as well as the median biases, dispersions, and outlier fractions of their measured flux distributions. Five model-fitting software packages (DeepLeGATo, Galapagos-2, Morfometryka, ProFit, and SourceXtractor++) were compared, all typically providing good results. Of the differences among them, some were at least partly due to the distinct strategies adopted to perform the measurements. In the best-case scenario, the median bias of the measured fluxes in the analytical profile realisations is below 1% at a signal-to-noise ratio above 5 in IE, and above 10 in all the other bands; the dispersion of the distribution is typically comparable to the theoretically expected one, with a small fraction of catastrophic outliers. However, we can expect that real observations will prove to be more demanding, since the results were found to be less accurate for the most realistic realisation. We conclude that existing model-fitting software can provide accurate photometric measurements on Euclid datasets. The results of the challenge are fully available and reproducible through an online plotting tool.",
keywords = "Space and Planetary Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics",
author = "{Euclid Collaboration} and E. Merlin and M. Castellano and H. Bretonni{\`e}re and M. Huertas-Company and U. Kuchner and D. Tuccillo and F. Buitrago and Peterson, {J. R.} and Conselice, {C. J.} and F. Caro and P. Dimauro and L. Nemani and A. Fontana and M. K{\"u}mmel and B. H{\"a}u{\ss}ler and Hartley, {W. G.} and {Alvarez Ayllon}, A. and E. Bertin and P. Dubath and F. Ferrari and L. Ferreira and R. Gavazzi and D. Hern{\'a}ndez-Lang and G. Lucatelli and Robotham, {A. S. G.} and M. Schefer and C. Tortora and N. Aghanim and A. Amara and L. Amendola and N. Auricchio and M. Baldi and R. Bender and C. Bodendorf and E. Branchini and M. Brescia and S. Camera and V. Capobianco and C. Carbone and J. Carretero and Castander, {F. J.} and S. Cavuoti and A. Cimatti and R. Cledassou and Taylor, {A. N.} and Y. Wang and J. Weller and I. Hook and D. Potter and D. Scott",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1051/0004-6361/202245041",
language = "English",
volume = "671",
journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",
issn = "0004-6361",
publisher = "EDP Sciences",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Euclid preparation

T2 - XXV. The Euclid Morphology Challenge: Towards model-fitting photometry for billions of galaxies

AU - Euclid Collaboration

AU - Merlin, E.

AU - Castellano, M.

AU - Bretonnière, H.

AU - Huertas-Company, M.

AU - Kuchner, U.

AU - Tuccillo, D.

AU - Buitrago, F.

AU - Peterson, J. R.

AU - Conselice, C. J.

AU - Caro, F.

AU - Dimauro, P.

AU - Nemani, L.

AU - Fontana, A.

AU - Kümmel, M.

AU - Häußler, B.

AU - Hartley, W. G.

AU - Alvarez Ayllon, A.

AU - Bertin, E.

AU - Dubath, P.

AU - Ferrari, F.

AU - Ferreira, L.

AU - Gavazzi, R.

AU - Hernández-Lang, D.

AU - Lucatelli, G.

AU - Robotham, A. S. G.

AU - Schefer, M.

AU - Tortora, C.

AU - Aghanim, N.

AU - Amara, A.

AU - Amendola, L.

AU - Auricchio, N.

AU - Baldi, M.

AU - Bender, R.

AU - Bodendorf, C.

AU - Branchini, E.

AU - Brescia, M.

AU - Camera, S.

AU - Capobianco, V.

AU - Carbone, C.

AU - Carretero, J.

AU - Castander, F. J.

AU - Cavuoti, S.

AU - Cimatti, A.

AU - Cledassou, R.

AU - Taylor, A. N.

AU - Wang, Y.

AU - Weller, J.

AU - Hook, I.

AU - Potter, D.

AU - Scott, D.

PY - 2023/3/31

Y1 - 2023/3/31

N2 - The European Space Agency's Euclid mission will provide high-quality imaging for about 1.5 billion galaxies. A software pipeline to automatically process and analyse such a huge amount of data in real time is being developed by the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium; this pipeline will include a model-fitting algorithm, which will provide photometric and morphological estimates of paramount importance for the core science goals of the mission and for legacy science. The Euclid Morphology Challenge is a comparative investigation of the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data, aimed at providing the baseline to identify the best-suited algorithm to be implemented in the pipeline. In this paper we describe the simulated dataset, and we discuss the photometry results. A companion paper is focussed on the structural and morphological estimates. We created mock Euclid images simulating five fields of view of 0.48 deg2 each in the IE band of the VIS instrument, containing a total of about one and a half million galaxies (of which 350 000 have a nominal signal-to-noise ratio above 5), each with three realisations of galaxy profiles (single and double Sérsic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network); for one of the fields in the double Sérsic realisation, we also simulated images for the three near-infrared YE, JE, and HE bands of the NISP-P instrument, and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands (u, g, r, i, and z), which together form a typical dataset for an Euclid observation. The images were simulated at the expected Euclid Wide Survey depths. To analyse the results, we created diagnostic plots and defined metrics to take into account the completeness of the provided catalogues, as well as the median biases, dispersions, and outlier fractions of their measured flux distributions. Five model-fitting software packages (DeepLeGATo, Galapagos-2, Morfometryka, ProFit, and SourceXtractor++) were compared, all typically providing good results. Of the differences among them, some were at least partly due to the distinct strategies adopted to perform the measurements. In the best-case scenario, the median bias of the measured fluxes in the analytical profile realisations is below 1% at a signal-to-noise ratio above 5 in IE, and above 10 in all the other bands; the dispersion of the distribution is typically comparable to the theoretically expected one, with a small fraction of catastrophic outliers. However, we can expect that real observations will prove to be more demanding, since the results were found to be less accurate for the most realistic realisation. We conclude that existing model-fitting software can provide accurate photometric measurements on Euclid datasets. The results of the challenge are fully available and reproducible through an online plotting tool.

AB - The European Space Agency's Euclid mission will provide high-quality imaging for about 1.5 billion galaxies. A software pipeline to automatically process and analyse such a huge amount of data in real time is being developed by the Science Ground Segment of the Euclid Consortium; this pipeline will include a model-fitting algorithm, which will provide photometric and morphological estimates of paramount importance for the core science goals of the mission and for legacy science. The Euclid Morphology Challenge is a comparative investigation of the performance of five model-fitting software packages on simulated Euclid data, aimed at providing the baseline to identify the best-suited algorithm to be implemented in the pipeline. In this paper we describe the simulated dataset, and we discuss the photometry results. A companion paper is focussed on the structural and morphological estimates. We created mock Euclid images simulating five fields of view of 0.48 deg2 each in the IE band of the VIS instrument, containing a total of about one and a half million galaxies (of which 350 000 have a nominal signal-to-noise ratio above 5), each with three realisations of galaxy profiles (single and double Sérsic, and 'realistic' profiles obtained with a neural network); for one of the fields in the double Sérsic realisation, we also simulated images for the three near-infrared YE, JE, and HE bands of the NISP-P instrument, and five Rubin/LSST optical complementary bands (u, g, r, i, and z), which together form a typical dataset for an Euclid observation. The images were simulated at the expected Euclid Wide Survey depths. To analyse the results, we created diagnostic plots and defined metrics to take into account the completeness of the provided catalogues, as well as the median biases, dispersions, and outlier fractions of their measured flux distributions. Five model-fitting software packages (DeepLeGATo, Galapagos-2, Morfometryka, ProFit, and SourceXtractor++) were compared, all typically providing good results. Of the differences among them, some were at least partly due to the distinct strategies adopted to perform the measurements. In the best-case scenario, the median bias of the measured fluxes in the analytical profile realisations is below 1% at a signal-to-noise ratio above 5 in IE, and above 10 in all the other bands; the dispersion of the distribution is typically comparable to the theoretically expected one, with a small fraction of catastrophic outliers. However, we can expect that real observations will prove to be more demanding, since the results were found to be less accurate for the most realistic realisation. We conclude that existing model-fitting software can provide accurate photometric measurements on Euclid datasets. The results of the challenge are fully available and reproducible through an online plotting tool.

KW - Space and Planetary Science

KW - Astronomy and Astrophysics

U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/202245041

DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/202245041

M3 - Journal article

VL - 671

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

SN - 0004-6361

M1 - A101

ER -