Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Euclid preparation. LI. Forecasting the recover...

Electronic data

  • Enia_galaxy_properties

    Accepted author manuscript, 6.91 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • pdf

    7.24 MB, PDF document

Links

View graph of relations

Euclid preparation. LI. Forecasting the recovery of galaxy physical properties and their relations with template-fitting and machine-learning methods

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming

Standard

Euclid preparation. LI. Forecasting the recovery of galaxy physical properties and their relations with template-fitting and machine-learning methods. / Euclid Collaboration.
In: Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12.09.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1a570ec036024ebe95fda944214d8569,
title = "Euclid preparation. LI. Forecasting the recovery of galaxy physical properties and their relations with template-fitting and machine-learning methods",
abstract = "Euclid will collect an enormous amount of data during the mission's lifetime, observing billions of galaxies in the extragalactic sky. Along with traditional template-fitting methods, numerous machine learning algorithms have been presented for computing their photometric redshifts and physical parameters (PPs), requiring significantly less computing effort while producing equivalent performance measures. However, their performance is limited by the quality and amount of input information, to the point where the recovery of some well-established physical relationships between parameters might not be guaranteed. To forecast the reliability of Euclid photo-$z$s and PPs calculations, we produced two mock catalogs simulating Euclid photometry. We simulated the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS) and Euclid Deep Fields (EDF). We tested the performance of a template-fitting algorithm (Phosphoros) and four ML methods in recovering photo-$z$s, PPs (stellar masses and star formation rates), and the SFMS. To mimic the Euclid processing as closely as possible, the models were trained with Phosphoros-recovered labels. For the EWS, we found that the best results are achieved with a mixed labels approach, training the models with wide survey features and labels from the Phosphoros results on deeper photometry, that is, with the best possible set of labels for a given photometry. This imposes a prior, helping the models to better discern cases in degenerate regions of feature space, that is, when galaxies have similar magnitudes and colors but different redshifts and PPs, with performance metrics even better than those found with Phosphoros. We found no more than 3% performance degradation using a COSMOS-like reference sample or removing u band data, which will not be available until after data release DR1. The best results are obtained for the EDF, with appropriate recovery of photo-$z$, PPs, and the SFMS.",
keywords = "Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies",
author = "{Euclid Collaboration} and A. Enia and M. Bolzonella and L. Pozzetti and A. Humphrey and Cunha, {P. A. C.} and Hartley, {W. G.} and F. Dubath and S. Paltani and {Lopez Lopez}, X. and S. Quai and S. Bardelli and L. Bisigello and S. Cavuoti and {De Lucia}, G. and M. Ginolfi and A. Grazian and M. Siudek and C. Tortora and G. Zamorani and N. Aghanim and B. Altieri and A. Amara and S. Andreon and N. Auricchio and C. Baccigalupi and M. Baldi and R. Bender and C. Bodendorf and D. Bonino and E. Branchini and M. Brescia and J. Brinchmann and S. Camera and V. Capobianco and C. Carbone and J. Carretero and S. Casas and Castander, {F. J.} and M. Castellano and G. Castignani and A. Cimatti and C. Colodro-Conde and G. Congedo and Conselice, {C. J.} and L. Conversi and Y. Copin and L. Corcione and F. Courbin and I. Hook",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "12",
language = "English",
journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",
issn = "1432-0746",
publisher = "EDP Sciences",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Euclid preparation. LI. Forecasting the recovery of galaxy physical properties and their relations with template-fitting and machine-learning methods

AU - Euclid Collaboration

AU - Enia, A.

AU - Bolzonella, M.

AU - Pozzetti, L.

AU - Humphrey, A.

AU - Cunha, P. A. C.

AU - Hartley, W. G.

AU - Dubath, F.

AU - Paltani, S.

AU - Lopez Lopez, X.

AU - Quai, S.

AU - Bardelli, S.

AU - Bisigello, L.

AU - Cavuoti, S.

AU - De Lucia, G.

AU - Ginolfi, M.

AU - Grazian, A.

AU - Siudek, M.

AU - Tortora, C.

AU - Zamorani, G.

AU - Aghanim, N.

AU - Altieri, B.

AU - Amara, A.

AU - Andreon, S.

AU - Auricchio, N.

AU - Baccigalupi, C.

AU - Baldi, M.

AU - Bender, R.

AU - Bodendorf, C.

AU - Bonino, D.

AU - Branchini, E.

AU - Brescia, M.

AU - Brinchmann, J.

AU - Camera, S.

AU - Capobianco, V.

AU - Carbone, C.

AU - Carretero, J.

AU - Casas, S.

AU - Castander, F. J.

AU - Castellano, M.

AU - Castignani, G.

AU - Cimatti, A.

AU - Colodro-Conde, C.

AU - Congedo, G.

AU - Conselice, C. J.

AU - Conversi, L.

AU - Copin, Y.

AU - Corcione, L.

AU - Courbin, F.

AU - Hook, I.

PY - 2024/9/12

Y1 - 2024/9/12

N2 - Euclid will collect an enormous amount of data during the mission's lifetime, observing billions of galaxies in the extragalactic sky. Along with traditional template-fitting methods, numerous machine learning algorithms have been presented for computing their photometric redshifts and physical parameters (PPs), requiring significantly less computing effort while producing equivalent performance measures. However, their performance is limited by the quality and amount of input information, to the point where the recovery of some well-established physical relationships between parameters might not be guaranteed. To forecast the reliability of Euclid photo-$z$s and PPs calculations, we produced two mock catalogs simulating Euclid photometry. We simulated the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS) and Euclid Deep Fields (EDF). We tested the performance of a template-fitting algorithm (Phosphoros) and four ML methods in recovering photo-$z$s, PPs (stellar masses and star formation rates), and the SFMS. To mimic the Euclid processing as closely as possible, the models were trained with Phosphoros-recovered labels. For the EWS, we found that the best results are achieved with a mixed labels approach, training the models with wide survey features and labels from the Phosphoros results on deeper photometry, that is, with the best possible set of labels for a given photometry. This imposes a prior, helping the models to better discern cases in degenerate regions of feature space, that is, when galaxies have similar magnitudes and colors but different redshifts and PPs, with performance metrics even better than those found with Phosphoros. We found no more than 3% performance degradation using a COSMOS-like reference sample or removing u band data, which will not be available until after data release DR1. The best results are obtained for the EDF, with appropriate recovery of photo-$z$, PPs, and the SFMS.

AB - Euclid will collect an enormous amount of data during the mission's lifetime, observing billions of galaxies in the extragalactic sky. Along with traditional template-fitting methods, numerous machine learning algorithms have been presented for computing their photometric redshifts and physical parameters (PPs), requiring significantly less computing effort while producing equivalent performance measures. However, their performance is limited by the quality and amount of input information, to the point where the recovery of some well-established physical relationships between parameters might not be guaranteed. To forecast the reliability of Euclid photo-$z$s and PPs calculations, we produced two mock catalogs simulating Euclid photometry. We simulated the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS) and Euclid Deep Fields (EDF). We tested the performance of a template-fitting algorithm (Phosphoros) and four ML methods in recovering photo-$z$s, PPs (stellar masses and star formation rates), and the SFMS. To mimic the Euclid processing as closely as possible, the models were trained with Phosphoros-recovered labels. For the EWS, we found that the best results are achieved with a mixed labels approach, training the models with wide survey features and labels from the Phosphoros results on deeper photometry, that is, with the best possible set of labels for a given photometry. This imposes a prior, helping the models to better discern cases in degenerate regions of feature space, that is, when galaxies have similar magnitudes and colors but different redshifts and PPs, with performance metrics even better than those found with Phosphoros. We found no more than 3% performance degradation using a COSMOS-like reference sample or removing u band data, which will not be available until after data release DR1. The best results are obtained for the EDF, with appropriate recovery of photo-$z$, PPs, and the SFMS.

KW - Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies

M3 - Journal article

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

SN - 1432-0746

ER -