Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluating a forensic service for people with l...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities: comparing approaches

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities: comparing approaches. / Fish, Rebecca; Lobley, John.
In: Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 5, No. 2, 06.2001, p. 97-109.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fish R, Lobley J. Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities: comparing approaches. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 2001 Jun;5(2):97-109. doi: 10.1177/146900470100500201

Author

Fish, Rebecca ; Lobley, John. / Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities : comparing approaches. In: Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 2001 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 97-109.

Bibtex

@article{069e6a3825494ba4843359d3a597342e,
title = "Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities: comparing approaches",
abstract = "This article reports on an evaluation of a new type of forensic learning disability service that is community based. Two evaluative approaches were used to identify, if any, the differences between reported quality of life experienced at a medium secure unit located in a large institutional setting with a community based one. A quality of life (QOL) questionnaire was administered pre-and post-move to all residents. The results from the quantitative aspect of this study indicated little change in QOL scores over time. Residents were also interviewed informally after their move as part of the evaluation. The interviews revealed many differences in people's lives since the move. Some of the reported strengths were: more frequent family and community contact, quality of house facilities, staff and atmosphere. Weaknesses included: restrictions on free time, lack of contact with people at the previous institution and a relatively limited range of activities. This information will contribute to the ongoing development of this new community based service, and will contribute to future planning of similar services. The authors stress the importance of subjective, qualitative accounts in service evaluation.",
keywords = "forensic service, quality of life, service evaluation, subjective accounts",
author = "Rebecca Fish and John Lobley",
year = "2001",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/146900470100500201",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "97--109",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1744-6295",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating a forensic service for people with learning disabilities

T2 - comparing approaches

AU - Fish, Rebecca

AU - Lobley, John

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - This article reports on an evaluation of a new type of forensic learning disability service that is community based. Two evaluative approaches were used to identify, if any, the differences between reported quality of life experienced at a medium secure unit located in a large institutional setting with a community based one. A quality of life (QOL) questionnaire was administered pre-and post-move to all residents. The results from the quantitative aspect of this study indicated little change in QOL scores over time. Residents were also interviewed informally after their move as part of the evaluation. The interviews revealed many differences in people's lives since the move. Some of the reported strengths were: more frequent family and community contact, quality of house facilities, staff and atmosphere. Weaknesses included: restrictions on free time, lack of contact with people at the previous institution and a relatively limited range of activities. This information will contribute to the ongoing development of this new community based service, and will contribute to future planning of similar services. The authors stress the importance of subjective, qualitative accounts in service evaluation.

AB - This article reports on an evaluation of a new type of forensic learning disability service that is community based. Two evaluative approaches were used to identify, if any, the differences between reported quality of life experienced at a medium secure unit located in a large institutional setting with a community based one. A quality of life (QOL) questionnaire was administered pre-and post-move to all residents. The results from the quantitative aspect of this study indicated little change in QOL scores over time. Residents were also interviewed informally after their move as part of the evaluation. The interviews revealed many differences in people's lives since the move. Some of the reported strengths were: more frequent family and community contact, quality of house facilities, staff and atmosphere. Weaknesses included: restrictions on free time, lack of contact with people at the previous institution and a relatively limited range of activities. This information will contribute to the ongoing development of this new community based service, and will contribute to future planning of similar services. The authors stress the importance of subjective, qualitative accounts in service evaluation.

KW - forensic service

KW - quality of life

KW - service evaluation

KW - subjective accounts

U2 - 10.1177/146900470100500201

DO - 10.1177/146900470100500201

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 97

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1744-6295

IS - 2

ER -