Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). / Yang, Chieh Ling; Connell, Louise A.; Eng, Janice J.
In: Physiotherapy Canada, Vol. 75, No. 2, 01.05.2023, p. 105-117.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Yang, CL, Connell, LA & Eng, JJ 2023, 'Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP)', Physiotherapy Canada, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2022-0117

APA

Yang, C. L., Connell, L. A., & Eng, J. J. (2023). Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). Physiotherapy Canada, 75(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc-2022-0117

Vancouver

Yang CL, Connell LA, Eng JJ. Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). Physiotherapy Canada. 2023 May 1;75(2):105-117. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2022-0117

Author

Yang, Chieh Ling ; Connell, Louise A. ; Eng, Janice J. / Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention : The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). In: Physiotherapy Canada. 2023 ; Vol. 75, No. 2. pp. 105-117.

Bibtex

@article{478f7dae52274ea3bc132ad75482583d,
title = "Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP)",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. Methods: Systematic evaluation of data sources including academic publishing metrics, publications, and surveys was used to describe the dissemination and implementation impact of the graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP). Three categories in the Payback Framework were evaluated: knowledge production and dissemination, benefits to future research and research use, and real-world uptake and implementation. Results: In the Knowledge production and dissemination category, seven publications, authored by the GRASP research team, were associated with the GRASP, and there were approximately 17,000 download counts of GRASP manuals from the website from 120 countries. In the Benefits to future research and research use category, 15 studies and 8 registered clinical trials, authored by researchers outside of the GRASP team, have used GRASP as an intervention. In the real-world uptake and implementation category, GRASP has informed recommendations in 2 clinical guidelines and 20 review papers, and had high implementation uptake (e.g., 35% [53/154] of UK therapists surveyed had used GRASP; 95% [649/681] who downloaded GRASP had used it). More than 75% of those who had used GRASP identified that GRASP provides more intensity in upper extremity rehabilitation, is evidence-based and easy to implement, and the equipment and manual are easy to obtain. Conclusion: The Payback Framework is useful to evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. GRASP has been implemented extensively in clinical practice and community in a relatively short time since it has been developed.",
keywords = "implementation science, information dissemination, rehabilitation, stroke, upper extremity",
author = "Yang, {Chieh Ling} and Connell, {Louise A.} and Eng, {Janice J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Canadian Physiotherapy Association, 2023.",
year = "2023",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3138/ptc-2022-0117",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Physiotherapy Canada",
issn = "0300-0508",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention

T2 - The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP)

AU - Yang, Chieh Ling

AU - Connell, Louise A.

AU - Eng, Janice J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Canadian Physiotherapy Association, 2023.

PY - 2023/5/1

Y1 - 2023/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. Methods: Systematic evaluation of data sources including academic publishing metrics, publications, and surveys was used to describe the dissemination and implementation impact of the graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP). Three categories in the Payback Framework were evaluated: knowledge production and dissemination, benefits to future research and research use, and real-world uptake and implementation. Results: In the Knowledge production and dissemination category, seven publications, authored by the GRASP research team, were associated with the GRASP, and there were approximately 17,000 download counts of GRASP manuals from the website from 120 countries. In the Benefits to future research and research use category, 15 studies and 8 registered clinical trials, authored by researchers outside of the GRASP team, have used GRASP as an intervention. In the real-world uptake and implementation category, GRASP has informed recommendations in 2 clinical guidelines and 20 review papers, and had high implementation uptake (e.g., 35% [53/154] of UK therapists surveyed had used GRASP; 95% [649/681] who downloaded GRASP had used it). More than 75% of those who had used GRASP identified that GRASP provides more intensity in upper extremity rehabilitation, is evidence-based and easy to implement, and the equipment and manual are easy to obtain. Conclusion: The Payback Framework is useful to evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. GRASP has been implemented extensively in clinical practice and community in a relatively short time since it has been developed.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. Methods: Systematic evaluation of data sources including academic publishing metrics, publications, and surveys was used to describe the dissemination and implementation impact of the graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP). Three categories in the Payback Framework were evaluated: knowledge production and dissemination, benefits to future research and research use, and real-world uptake and implementation. Results: In the Knowledge production and dissemination category, seven publications, authored by the GRASP research team, were associated with the GRASP, and there were approximately 17,000 download counts of GRASP manuals from the website from 120 countries. In the Benefits to future research and research use category, 15 studies and 8 registered clinical trials, authored by researchers outside of the GRASP team, have used GRASP as an intervention. In the real-world uptake and implementation category, GRASP has informed recommendations in 2 clinical guidelines and 20 review papers, and had high implementation uptake (e.g., 35% [53/154] of UK therapists surveyed had used GRASP; 95% [649/681] who downloaded GRASP had used it). More than 75% of those who had used GRASP identified that GRASP provides more intensity in upper extremity rehabilitation, is evidence-based and easy to implement, and the equipment and manual are easy to obtain. Conclusion: The Payback Framework is useful to evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. GRASP has been implemented extensively in clinical practice and community in a relatively short time since it has been developed.

KW - implementation science

KW - information dissemination

KW - rehabilitation

KW - stroke

KW - upper extremity

U2 - 10.3138/ptc-2022-0117

DO - 10.3138/ptc-2022-0117

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85169814380

VL - 75

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Physiotherapy Canada

JF - Physiotherapy Canada

SN - 0300-0508

IS - 2

ER -